Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Oct 19, 2016
SGT Robert Riley
36.6K
105
28
30
30
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 19
SPC Erich Guenther
2
2
0
So maybe I can help the discussion along a little bit here. Attached is a video from a recently discharged Infantry SSG. I have heard complaints like this from other recent dischargees. He went on the Drill Sergeant Path and spent time on the trail. Served with some elite units like the 101st Airborne and 1st Cav. But a couple of points of disagreement I have with him.

1. Confused about battlefield awards I understand why a 1SG gets a BRONZE STAR (meritorious) vs a E1-E4 getting a ARCOM (meritorious). But apparently nobody explained to him how the awards system works. In peace time garrison you had to almost be the second comming of Christ to get an ARCOM, very rare and it was not given out lightly. Still if he had a exceptional writeup then one of his E1-E4 could have done better with an award. Also, part of this is why the Infantry gets to wear the Blue Cord and Discs for doing their regular job. Over and above their job then yes they should get higher than ARCOM. They gave out ARCOMS in Vietnam as well. So this is not really a GWOT wartime thing.

2. Someone told him how RECRUITING works he hasn't really done it, you can tell from his comments. RECRUITER has the say who gets in and who does not, the quota stuff exists but the overwhealming pressure to make quota I was told disappeared over a decade ago. The quota is still there but you don't see NCO's crying about missing quota as they did in the 1990's when I was at USAREC as a civilian. A lot of that pressure is gone now.

3. Overweight issues date from the 1980's nothing has changed there with the decades long argument of what is obesity and what should and should not pass tape. In my view thats Army life some folks are going to scam and get away with it. That is what periodic RiFs are for.

4. Tatoos I agree with the policy it was a LOT stricter in the 1980's and I am not sure why they slacked up on the policy but the slacking up has caused a lot of confusion and hard feelings.

Just four of the points I disagree with off the bat, probably more. Anyways sorry in advance for the profanity he should have screened that out for youtube but he is fairly recent dischargee and that profanity habit hard to break. Took me a few years after ETS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RprtLmK8yqc
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC Patrick R Hughes
SPC Patrick R Hughes
9 y
Yes US Army is now the PC army brought to you by our commander-in-chief Mr. Obama. This shit has to change and soon.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hasbun
1
1
0
I've noticed that "political correctness" seems to be the popular buzzword when people don't get to indulge in their favorite cliché or prejudice of choice...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Specialist
1
1
0
100% agree. The military and the discipline of soldiers just coming out of basic is garbage. Only few come out with any discipline and that I would chalk up to just them having good personal character.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hasbun
1
1
0
You say emasculation, I say "expected to act like educated adults"... The days of being an illiterate caveman who can follow orders and not much else are gone...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David Willis
0
0
0
This issue has nothing to do with who is president. Trumps the guy now and you still have this trash almost a year later. Also political correctness doesn't mean you're now hindered from accomplishing the mission. Your dumb opinion and my dumb opinion don't keep our bullets from hitting their targets. In fact under the Bush admin during the surge, regulations were at there most lax. We had guys smoking weed, and getting on a plane for war the next day. Or dudes that didn't even come close to height and weight getting on the plane, and its understandable because I'd rather take a fat combat vet to war than a skinny guy who hasn't finished basic yet. Its war, bodies are needed. If the problem has spanned 3 presidents you cant just say its one president's fault. In my opinion (and that's all it is) this has been slowly happening since Vietnam started. When cameras are allowed to broadcast war images you instantly lose civilian support for the war. WW2 was so heavily backed not because we were attacked (because we were on 9/11 as well) but because our government basically lied to its citizens and told them we were winning handily when that wasn't really the case for 80% of the war. If fox news or cnn or brietbart or MSNBC had cameras on the beaches of Normandy and citizens saw entire groups of men being torn apart or drowning before they even landed on the beach the public image would be greatly different. Also since Vietnam our wars have been much more ambiguous we have fought against communism and terrorism which are ideals that you cant line against a wall and shoot or sit down at gun point and force a signed peace treaty. This has all been paired with more "news" and social media surges that give everyone a platform to speak their mind.

Simply put its a much more complex problem than "thanks obummer".
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
0
0
0
Yes agreed. Your people are well trained when they can do the job without you. That is how you grow.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC James Asbill
0
0
0
Amen .... So much truth in this post ..
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Sheila Lewis
0
0
0
The time is now to stop this negative course.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Harry Leuchen
0
0
0
I never knew that allowing all servicemembers, regardless of gender, race, religion, or sexual orientation, a chance to succeed was a bad thing.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
SPC Erich Guenther
9 y
He is complaining without knowing the issues. As an example on the surface the Gender Identity thing sounds like social engineering. But when you research the new regulations and there are only 2000-2500 transgenders on Active Duty now, it's really a very trivial change for a tiny population that probably will not even impact him and given the regulations SecDef Ash Carter approved........ the number of transgenders in the Armed Forces will probably decline significantly over the next 10 years. Thats what I suspect with the new regs but we'll see. SecDef Ash Carter was pretty clear he was clarifying a gray area and that was all he was doing in the area of transgenders. But that message was lost on a lot of people and they have never even read the new regulations........the old world was comming to an end and transgenders would be everywhere. Which can't happen because there are not that many of them in the general population either.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close