Posted on Apr 10, 2024
Older Swiss women win historic climate court ruling
482
7
3
3
3
0
In a landmark decision, the European court of human rights has ruled that weak government climate policies violate citizens' fundamental human rights, in a win for a group of Swiss female climate activists.
The court’s top bench ruled that Switzerland had violated the rights of a group of older Swiss women to family life, but threw out a French mayor’s case against France and that of a group of young Portuguese people against 32 European countries
The court’s top bench ruled that Switzerland had violated the rights of a group of older Swiss women to family life, but threw out a French mayor’s case against France and that of a group of young Portuguese people against 32 European countries
Posted 20 d ago
Responses: 1
Posted 20 d ago
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel good to see their Court is fair...
In a landmark decision, the European court of human rights has ruled that weak government climate policies violate citizens' fundamental human rights, in a win for a group of Swiss female climate activists.
The court’s top bench ruled that Switzerland had violated the rights of a group of older Swiss women to family life, but threw out a French mayor’s case against France and that of a group of young Portuguese people against 32 European countries...
In a landmark decision, the European court of human rights has ruled that weak government climate policies violate citizens' fundamental human rights, in a win for a group of Swiss female climate activists.
The court’s top bench ruled that Switzerland had violated the rights of a group of older Swiss women to family life, but threw out a French mayor’s case against France and that of a group of young Portuguese people against 32 European countries...
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
20 d
SGT (Join to see) 17? 18 Judges and Only One Voted against the Ladies and that was the British Judge.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
20 d
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel - next year they will be able to expand the SCOTUS to balance it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Read This Next