Avatar feed
Responses: 3
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1
1
0
Why bring back a 60 year old design that is less capable harder to maintain and would nee redesign for new engines . That is like bringing back the slide-rule it was once the best option but that time is long past
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
>1 y
No real need to redesign the engine as the engines we had in WWII were pretty bad ass. You could place a turboprop on it as they are more efficient and JP8 is more readily reliable and Pratt and Whitney already makes an engine with little mods that would fit. This plane would be far cheaper to use and maintain than anything we currently have in the fleet.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
The Bronco already gas a Turnoprop, an engine that bad not been produced in decades as by modern standards a maintenence heavy pig with low performance. a new engine and all the structural supports and systems for that engine would need to be re-engineered. It would be far better that what we currently use but fat inferior and more costlyvthatbthe two aircraft the USAF is considering. Both are proven airframes, designed for easy main acne and low cost operation from the start. Not to mention being a couple of genrati OK newer in systems and aerodynamics.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
1
1
0
The mantra from the Air Force has been the F-35 can do all the missions. Then wala! A propeller driven plane comes into existence.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
1
1
0
Sgt Wayne Wood Bronco was a Great Aircraft, Hell Yeah!
(1)
Comment
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
Was, such things chance with time, a Sopwith Camel was a great aircraft also.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close