Avatar feed
Responses: 9
CPO Frank Coluccio
5
5
0
Correct men if I'm wrong, but if a Vietnam Vet served "in country" they are referred to as a "Vietnam Vet," but if they were in the military at the time, but did not spend any time "in country" they are referred to a "Vietnam Era Vet."
If this is correct, then there is a US Congressman that has been identifying himself as a "Vietnam Vet" for YEARS, yet he did not spend one second in theater. How is that any different?
BTW - the Congressman is none other than that beacon moderation, Jim McDermott (D-WA)
(5)
Comment
(0)
CPL B Wood
CPL B Wood
8 y
That guy is garbage, and retiring.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Gabriel Bregg
SPC Gabriel Bregg
8 y
I'm not sure that's an actual distinction or just something they do. My Dad was always careful to describe himself as a Vietnam Era vet (he was a radar tech in the Navy) but I'm not sure it's any kind of actual official thing.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Christopher Churilla
3
3
0
I don't get why he would do it. In this age of lightning-fast fact verification, did he really think no one would check out his claims?
(3)
Comment
(0)
SPC Aaron Stephens
SPC Aaron Stephens
8 y
Yes.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG James Bigbie
1
1
0
It's wrong to claim anything that you didn't earn. Politicians should know that as soon as you claim anything, somebody will check what said. Can't blame a "staffer", he's responsible for what is said in his name. Glad he's resigning.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close