4
4
0
This is how data is being attenuated and even changed. The premise of this model and the site in general, are spot on. CMDCM Gene Treants LTC Stephen F. LTC Stephen C. Capt Jeff S. PO1 John Miller SSgt John S. CPT L S COL Mikel J. Burroughs SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4" SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL Cpl (Join to see) Sgt David G Duchesneau
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK
Posted from hockeyschtick.blogspot.comPosted in these groups: 
1W0X1: Weather
Climate Change
1W0X1: Weather Climate Change
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 1
1
1
0
Thanks for alerting us and pointing us the website SSgt (Join to see).
I concur with the premise of the article as well. I found the following paragraphs refreshing in their honesty in the midst of tis cynical age.
"The climate confab’s self-described political success is rooted in a conceit and a bribe. The conceit is that the terms of the agreement will have some tangible impact on global temperatures. The big breakthrough is supposed to be that for the first time developing and developed countries have committed to reducing carbon emissions. But the commitments by these nations are voluntary with no enforcement mechanism.
China (the No. 1 CO2 emitter) and India (No. 3 after the U.S.) have made commitments that they may or may not honor, depending on whether they can meet them without interfering with economic growth. If the choice is lifting millions out of poverty or reducing CO2, poverty reduction will prevail—as it should."
I concur with the premise of the article as well. I found the following paragraphs refreshing in their honesty in the midst of tis cynical age.
"The climate confab’s self-described political success is rooted in a conceit and a bribe. The conceit is that the terms of the agreement will have some tangible impact on global temperatures. The big breakthrough is supposed to be that for the first time developing and developed countries have committed to reducing carbon emissions. But the commitments by these nations are voluntary with no enforcement mechanism.
China (the No. 1 CO2 emitter) and India (No. 3 after the U.S.) have made commitments that they may or may not honor, depending on whether they can meet them without interfering with economic growth. If the choice is lifting millions out of poverty or reducing CO2, poverty reduction will prevail—as it should."
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google