Avatar feed
Responses: 12
MSG David Chappell
6
6
0
Bergdhal nope no idea. I mean I know that soldier who striped his armor and weapons slipped out of the wire abondoning his post was last seen speaking to local population seeking Al Qaeda operatives. I know about the deserter who got soldiers killed who were seeking him. There is a question he collaborated and gave intelligence but that is speculation. That Bergdhal should be taken back to Iraq and executed as a deserter and sympathizer. Just my opinion but if your facts are different please share.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
8 y
MSG David Chappell well said and articulately conveyed! I agree whole-heartily.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG David Chappell
MSG David Chappell
8 y
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL - Truth speaks for itself
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
8 y
If he goes back, can you send Westborough Baptist with him?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
SGT Damaso V Santana
8 y
SSG Warren Swan - A Disposable Escort! Brilliant Idea!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Warren Swan
6
6
0
I see this as a stretch by the defense attorneys. Trump while wrong, shouldn't be the end all be all of this case. If they're worried that his speeches could give issues in court, then why not call everyone on FB,Twitter, Blog Writers, everyone on RP, congress and their aides, and our grandmothers for talks. Everyone has said something about this man. Just accept that he did what he did, caused six lives to be lost so he could play stupid games.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
8 y
"Scope of influence" and the ability to "sway the case."

When a General makes comments about a pending case it has significantly more effect than a private or even an NCO. We've seen how even the "perception' of Command Influence can taint a court case.

Although Mr. Trump is not in Command, he is running for a position which is. We go from B&W concepts to very Gray.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
8 y
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS - Good point, but he's going to be judged by a panel of his "peers". I hope they really aren't his peers or they'd all be draft dodgers or deserters from today. But no matter who you are, if you're military or have served, you know this case. So to get a fair and unbiased set of Jurors is crazy to think, and ignorant to believe. I know the judicial system should be allowed to do it's thing, but in his case, his actions with the media, along with constant speaking by those who were in his PLT WILL taint damn near anyone. So Trump while running for CINC, he's a low hanging fruit. The media Bergdhal talked to, the fact it was released, and the sheer amount of coverage this has gotten kills any argument the defense can raise. I'm not sure if you have the ability to go for a Judge only trial, but I'd go there before having a panel decide for me in this case. This case to me is the Titanic for his defense lawyers.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG David Chappell
4
4
0
Wait Bergdhal you mean that deserter we traded 5 top terrorists for? I mean someone someone explain I thought our stance was "don't negotiate with terrorists"?
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close