0
0
0
Going on right now.
Two people were injured in a shooting at UCLA on Wednesday morning, prompting a massive response from local and federal law enforcement, according to a police and university spokespersons.
Two people were injured in a shooting at UCLA on Wednesday morning, prompting a massive response from local and federal law enforcement, according to a police and university spokespersons.
Shooting at UCLA prompts campus lockdown
Posted from latimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Los Angeles
Shooting (Sport)
Los Angeles Shooting (Sport)
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 4
4
4
0
Once again they will blame the gun and every legal law abiding gun owner...
(4)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Yes they will. This is more fodder for the likes of Clintoon, and Obamalamadingdong.
(1)
(0)
SSG Pete Fleming
MSG (Join to see) - I know right, and people would observe them... what a better world this would be
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
SGT (Join to see)
Turns out it was a professor and a student. The student obviously didn't know it is a gun free zone.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
I'm going to make a series of SWAGs though I've neither heard of the incident nor clicked on the link ... Let me know how many I've got right / wrong / unable to determine at this time.
1. The shooter(s) was in clear violation of the highly visible Gun Free Zone signs.
2. The shooter(s) violated several laws already on the books.
3. None of the victims had a firearm. (Note, if a shooter was killed, they don't count as a victim).
4. The only person there with the ability to take down the shooter had firearms or
5. The shooting of unarmed victims stopped once the police showed up with firearms.
6. The media are pissing on themselves trying to glorify the murderers by repeating their names and motives.
7. Of course the requisite vilification of firearms and the question "What can we do to stop this blah blah blah"
8. Some politician(s) will get on the news to blah blah blah...
Well lemme know ... or not ... Don't think I can muster enough give a crap.
1. The shooter(s) was in clear violation of the highly visible Gun Free Zone signs.
2. The shooter(s) violated several laws already on the books.
3. None of the victims had a firearm. (Note, if a shooter was killed, they don't count as a victim).
4. The only person there with the ability to take down the shooter had firearms or
5. The shooting of unarmed victims stopped once the police showed up with firearms.
6. The media are pissing on themselves trying to glorify the murderers by repeating their names and motives.
7. Of course the requisite vilification of firearms and the question "What can we do to stop this blah blah blah"
8. Some politician(s) will get on the news to blah blah blah...
Well lemme know ... or not ... Don't think I can muster enough give a crap.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
MSG (Join to see), Wrong on all questions. The media still doesn't know who they are or what the motive was. There were two killed. It was a murder sucicide. The shooting stopped long before the police showed up.,
What don't you watch the news or click on the link? Then you will know more than I do.
What don't you watch the news or click on the link? Then you will know more than I do.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google