Posted on Nov 17, 2022
3rd Circuit Upholds Federal Ban on Non-Violent Felons Owning Guns
2.88K
8
4
3
3
0
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 3
I would go so far as to reinstate even violent felons - after they have served their time and paid their restitution.
And I mean FULL reinstatement. Voting, guns, employability, all of it. If you have done your time, you have done your time. Period.
But I also am for serving your FULL sentence. No early release due to crowding (or pandemics), no "good time" bonuses, and very strict and heavily scrutinized parole boards. Yes, once you are done with your sentence, you should be allowed to fully return to society. But you had better do your sentence.
And I mean FULL reinstatement. Voting, guns, employability, all of it. If you have done your time, you have done your time. Period.
But I also am for serving your FULL sentence. No early release due to crowding (or pandemics), no "good time" bonuses, and very strict and heavily scrutinized parole boards. Yes, once you are done with your sentence, you should be allowed to fully return to society. But you had better do your sentence.
(1)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SGT James Murphy I do. Do YOU know the stats?
The top three demographic predictors for recidivism in order are:
Sex (male more likely)
Age (younger more likely) and
Income (poor more likely)
If we keep folks in for their FULL sentence they will age out of high risk. And if we give them their full rights it enables (does not guarantee, but does enable) upward mobility and financial stability.
The current system where we let youngsters out but make sure they can't get a decent job all but guarantees recidivism.
I have actually studied this for more than just a hobby. I am not talking out my 4th point, here.
But regardless of all of that, rights are RIGHTS. If the government has the authority to remove them - and remove them permanently, no less - they are no longer rights, but privileges
The top three demographic predictors for recidivism in order are:
Sex (male more likely)
Age (younger more likely) and
Income (poor more likely)
If we keep folks in for their FULL sentence they will age out of high risk. And if we give them their full rights it enables (does not guarantee, but does enable) upward mobility and financial stability.
The current system where we let youngsters out but make sure they can't get a decent job all but guarantees recidivism.
I have actually studied this for more than just a hobby. I am not talking out my 4th point, here.
But regardless of all of that, rights are RIGHTS. If the government has the authority to remove them - and remove them permanently, no less - they are no longer rights, but privileges
(0)
(0)
Some who should not be caught up in stuff like this always are, it seems.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

2nd Amendment
Law
