Avatar feed
Responses: 15
MAJ James Woods
5
5
0
Shame. He was only doing his job under the law: investigating a complaint.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Steve McFarland
5
5
0
Except that the "whistleblower" didn't have anything to blow the whistle on, because he didn't have any firsthand information.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
>1 y
That did not matter to the issue at hand. The IG did what was required of him by law. Plain and simple.
(5)
Reply
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
Thus why the IG team investigated the complaint and found the credible witnesses. That’s how it works.
(4)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close