Avatar feed
Responses: 6
LTC John Griscom
4
4
0
Let's use a big eraser and eliminate everything that offends anybody. Rewrite history (or get rid of it altogether) so we are just one big happy (ignorant) family.
Anyone want to take a guess on the cost of doing this
What about concentrating on things that support the soldier.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Eugene Chu
4
4
0
I think public needs to understand that the base names were actually meant as an insult to the Confederacy. Pasting quote about how one base was named after a toxic failure and not meant to lionize the CSA

"As a leading Confederate general, Braxton Bragg (1817–1876) earned a reputation for incompetence, for wantonly shooting his own soldiers, and for losing battles. This public image established him not only as a scapegoat for the South’s military failures but also as the chief whipping boy of the Confederacy."

https://uncpress.org/book/ [login to see] 752/braxton-bragg/
(4)
Comment
(0)
COL John McClellan
COL John McClellan
4 y
Your link is to a book review. Where is the assertion that base naming was intended as an insult, and the scholarly research that substantiates that? My research suggests that these base namings were more a part of a broad re-writing of history built around the "lost cause" movement in the deep south.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Cryptologic Technician Collection
PO1 (Join to see)
4 y
COL John McClellan - I understood it to be about reconciliation, but now I am not sure anymore. There seems to be a lot of conflicting information.

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/06/army-bases-confederate-names/
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
1
1
0
MSgt Neil Greenfield Long Past Due!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close