Posted on Sep 20, 2020
Pelosi won't rule out impeaching Trump to stop him filling SCOTUS seat
540
63
18
6
6
0
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/09/pelosi-wont-rule-out-impeaching-trump-to-stop-him-filling-scotus-seat/?utm_source=breaking_email&utm_campaign=breaking_mailchimp&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Master+List&utm_campaign=36910e3459-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_09_20_04_57&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c4ef113e0-36910e3 [login to see] 9&mc_cid=36910e3459&mc_eid=af4a65fdc7
Pelosi won't rule out impeaching Trump to stop him filling SCOTUS seat
Posted from americanmilitarynews.comPosted in these groups: 
Office of the President (POTUS)U.S. House of Representatives
Office of the President (POTUS)U.S. House of Representatives
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
8
8
0
It was wrong when then Senate Majority Leader Reid (D) invoked the rule change and changed the Senate rules to by-pass a filibuster on court nominations.
It was wrong when Majority Leader McConnel (R) refused to conduct a confirmation hearing on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
It was wrong for Speaker Pelosi (D) to put the nation through an impeachment that stood no chance whatsoever, just to smear President Trump during the election cycle.
It would be wrong for Speaker Pelosi (D) to impeach President Trump as a delay process to try and run out the clock in hopes that Candidate Biden wins the November election.
Whoever is President is President until 12 O'clock noon on January 20, of the fourth year in their term.
It is time to clean house, but clearly neither party is willing to do so. And neither are the voters.
It was wrong when Majority Leader McConnel (R) refused to conduct a confirmation hearing on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
It was wrong for Speaker Pelosi (D) to put the nation through an impeachment that stood no chance whatsoever, just to smear President Trump during the election cycle.
It would be wrong for Speaker Pelosi (D) to impeach President Trump as a delay process to try and run out the clock in hopes that Candidate Biden wins the November election.
Whoever is President is President until 12 O'clock noon on January 20, of the fourth year in their term.
It is time to clean house, but clearly neither party is willing to do so. And neither are the voters.
(8)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Apparently, Nancy knows that two wrongs don't make a right. Maybe six or seven will?
(5)
(0)
7
7
0
She needs to resign, MSgt Danny Hope. She objects to everything that President Trump does, even if it’s to the advantage of the American people. She’s an obstructionist, not a Democrat.
(7)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
SGT (Join to see) - So if the Speaker of the House opposes the POTUS, it's "Checks & Balances" but if POTUS opposes the Speaker of the House, it's somehow unconstitutional? Your logic needs work.
As for Pelosi, in all objectivity, please list everything she has done FOR the American People AS A WHOLE, or even what she has done to better the lives of her own constituents.
Before you ask what Trump has done, know that I have a 7 page list of his accomplishments that were done in just his first year and a half.
As for Pelosi, in all objectivity, please list everything she has done FOR the American People AS A WHOLE, or even what she has done to better the lives of her own constituents.
Before you ask what Trump has done, know that I have a 7 page list of his accomplishments that were done in just his first year and a half.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
SSG(P) (Join to see) - please reread my original comment. You might realize that it’s not a support of Pelosi as much as it is a support of common sense. My original comment wasn’t a ProPelosi/AntiTrump statement. Your comprehension needs work.
List everything she has done for the People? If you reread my statement, you’ll realize that I stated, “I generally disagree with most of what she does..”. Not exactly high praise.
Best of luck to you.
List everything she has done for the People? If you reread my statement, you’ll realize that I stated, “I generally disagree with most of what she does..”. Not exactly high praise.
Best of luck to you.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
SSG(P) (Join to see) - in fact, luck is more likely for the proactive, not the lazy.
So, best of luck to you. Get out there and get some.
https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.23200
So, best of luck to you. Get out there and get some.
https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.23200
“Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information...
Serendipity occurs when unexpected circumstances and an “aha” moment of insight result in a valuable, unanticipated outcome. Designing digital information environments to support serendipity can not ...
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
So, now she believes that nominating a Supreme Court Justice is an impeachable offense. Wow! That should be added to the dictionary as part of the definition of delusional. Sorry, Nancy. Impeachment is only an indictment. Even a faulty indictment can't stop him...
(5)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
Can you see it? Charges? Nominating a Supreme Court Justice.
Defense: U.S. Constitution, Article 2
Defense: U.S. Constitution, Article 2
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google