Posted on Feb 25, 2021
Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act announced Wednesday
628
29
4
11
11
0
This story has Me confused. Research shows this to have happened a couple of years ago, but following the embedded link I was directed to a .pdf file dated a couple of days ago. MontanaRightNow is the only source I could find with this story. I'm just the messenger.
TSgt David L., SPC Randy Zimmerman,
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
PO3 Bob McCord, SSG Gordon Holmes,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, SGT Robert Pryor,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, MSgt David Hoffman,
SFC Bernard Walko, SSG Michael Noll,
SPC Nancy Greene, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
TSgt David L., SPC Randy Zimmerman,
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
PO3 Bob McCord, SSG Gordon Holmes,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, SGT Robert Pryor,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, MSgt David Hoffman,
SFC Bernard Walko, SSG Michael Noll,
SPC Nancy Greene, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act announced Wednesday
Posted from montanarightnow.com
2nd Amendment
Law
Congress
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 3
5
5
0
There are those afraid of an armed insurrection who would want to disarm those who can best make use of a weapon.
(5)
(0)
5
5
0
1
1
0
Do Not Like.
I am enrolled in the VA, and have amongst my other issues, mental health diagnoses. So yes, I AM in the affected group.
But, still... do not like. Not because I am against the idea, but because it ONLY covers the VA. The issue at large is the violation of due process. People can have their second Amendment rights stripped based without having a chance to defend themselves or their right, based on psychological diagnoses. This happens without a judge, without a trial or even a hearing. And then they are left to fight a legal battle (and pay for it!) to get their enumerated rights back. Wrong, wrong, wrong. This bill is an attempt to prevent VA from participating in that farcical process, which is great! But A) it doesn't protect veterans from OTHER sources stripping them of their rights, and B) it only covers veterans.
When it comes to the Constitution, and the rights espoused within it and its Amendments, I did NOT sign up and fight to protect only veterans. I signed up and fought to protect ALL Americans. In a way, this bill, by saying that veterans are more worthy of Constitutional rights than non-veterans, is a slap in the face to all veterans who signed up to serve all Americans, not just those currently or formerly in uniform.
I am enrolled in the VA, and have amongst my other issues, mental health diagnoses. So yes, I AM in the affected group.
But, still... do not like. Not because I am against the idea, but because it ONLY covers the VA. The issue at large is the violation of due process. People can have their second Amendment rights stripped based without having a chance to defend themselves or their right, based on psychological diagnoses. This happens without a judge, without a trial or even a hearing. And then they are left to fight a legal battle (and pay for it!) to get their enumerated rights back. Wrong, wrong, wrong. This bill is an attempt to prevent VA from participating in that farcical process, which is great! But A) it doesn't protect veterans from OTHER sources stripping them of their rights, and B) it only covers veterans.
When it comes to the Constitution, and the rights espoused within it and its Amendments, I did NOT sign up and fight to protect only veterans. I signed up and fought to protect ALL Americans. In a way, this bill, by saying that veterans are more worthy of Constitutional rights than non-veterans, is a slap in the face to all veterans who signed up to serve all Americans, not just those currently or formerly in uniform.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google