Posted on Nov 12, 2021
Appeals court re-affirms stay on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites 'severe' risks
648
22
13
4
4
0
Appeals court re-affirms stay on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites 'severe' risks https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/appeals-court-re-affirms-stay-biden-workplace-vaccine-mandate
This will help the economy and I'm sure the stock market will do very well on Monday. This on of many of President Biden's consistent lies when he wouldn't put a vaccine mandate and I won't be surprised if the Appellate Court holds it up and the Supreme Court won't even want it to look at it. Lt Col Charlie Brown SFC Michael Hasbun
This will help the economy and I'm sure the stock market will do very well on Monday. This on of many of President Biden's consistent lies when he wouldn't put a vaccine mandate and I won't be surprised if the Appellate Court holds it up and the Supreme Court won't even want it to look at it. Lt Col Charlie Brown SFC Michael Hasbun
Appeals court re-affirms stay on Biden workplace vaccine mandate, cites 'severe' risks
Posted from foxbusiness.com
Joe Biden
Supreme Court
Law
Employment
Discrimination
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
4
4
0
LTC (Join to see) I was going to post this earlier... so here is a remark at the end of the article.
"Bubbles30566
The University of PA just released a study saying that 30% of the tested deer population in Iowa has shown positive for Covid-19. If the virus has found a place for itself in a non-human population it will mutate further and keep coming back. Much like the flu. Also, remember that the pandemic of 1918 lasted four years. First documented case was found in late 1917 and the last documented case was in 1921."
"Bubbles30566
The University of PA just released a study saying that 30% of the tested deer population in Iowa has shown positive for Covid-19. If the virus has found a place for itself in a non-human population it will mutate further and keep coming back. Much like the flu. Also, remember that the pandemic of 1918 lasted four years. First documented case was found in late 1917 and the last documented case was in 1921."
(4)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - F.Y.I. - my comments to Sgt. Steve McFarland do not include you.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Did any of you lay people actually read the opinion? LTC (Join to see), did you? Or SGT (Join to see), did you?
It's not as good as you think it is, it flat out states that vaccines can be mandated by the government, and delineates the way that this would need to happen.
It's not as good as you think it is, it flat out states that vaccines can be mandated by the government, and delineates the way that this would need to happen.
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett Yes... I read the "FOX" short article & just re-read it. This is my take on it...
..."The Fifth Circuit granted a temporary stay on enforcement of the federal mandate on Nov. 6, one day after the rule was announced. In its reaffirmation Friday, the court said the mandate "exposes [petitioners] to severe financial risk" and "threatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects)."
What's your professional opinion?
..."The Fifth Circuit granted a temporary stay on enforcement of the federal mandate on Nov. 6, one day after the rule was announced. In its reaffirmation Friday, the court said the mandate "exposes [petitioners] to severe financial risk" and "threatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects)."
What's your professional opinion?
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
SGT (Join to see) - I think that the OSHA mandate was an overreach and unconstitutional. I also think that there are federal statutes in place that can be used in a constitutional manner to support a vaccine mandate, without having to use employers to enforce it (which is just as bad as setting out citizens as abortion vigilantes). It also doesn't have to be under the Commerce Clause.
And by opinion, I meant the court opinion, not what Fox wrote. See BST Holdings, LLC, et al v OSHA et al. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf
And by opinion, I meant the court opinion, not what Fox wrote. See BST Holdings, LLC, et al v OSHA et al. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett - Thanks for the your take on it & the opinion. It's here for anyone who really wants to know the "truth" of the state of the case.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
SGT (Join to see) COL Jon Thompson SGT (Join to see) Lt Col Charlie Brown LTC Stephen F. SMSgt Lawrence McCarter CSM Charles Hayden LTC Greg Henning
I don't see the usual administrators here. I need somebody to fix my posting because it got corrupted and you can't read the article. Could someone help me here?
SSG Robert Mark Odom
I don't see the usual administrators here. I need somebody to fix my posting because it got corrupted and you can't read the article. Could someone help me here?
SSG Robert Mark Odom
(3)
(0)
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) Maybe it "self-corrupted" because I read part of it & it SHOCKED itself... Lol...
(1)
(0)
Maj William W. 'Bill' Price
LTC (Join to see) It came up for me too...but you won't get any admin support. The rules aren't the same for everyone anymore.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google