Posted on Nov 18, 2021

Of Arms and the Law: Thoughts on the Rittenhouse attackers

SGT (Join to see)

326

3

1

2

0

Things the defense was not allowed to bring up in Kenosha.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, MSgt David Hoffman,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)

Of Arms and the Law: Thoughts on the Rittenhouse attackers

Posted from armsandthelaw.com

Posted in these groups: Original

Crime

Judiciary

Posted >1 y ago

Responses: 1

1

0

SFC Casey O'Mally

Posted >1 y ago

Not allowed to be brought up because not relevant.

None of those individuals were on trial. Additionally, Rittenhouse did not have any of that information at the time of the shooting, so it was impossible for him to base his decision to shoot upon it, nor was it possible that this information played into his perception of danger.

Relevant to US, the spectators, but not relevant to the law. It was a good call to exclude it. Just like it was a good call to deny prosecutor calling Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz "victims."

(1)

Comment

(0)

Of Arms and the Law: Thoughts on the Rittenhouse attackers

Of Arms and the Law: Thoughts on the Rittenhouse attackers

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.