Posted on Jan 5, 2022
New York Times Admits America Sacrificed Children’s Well-Being For Sake Of Adults’ Safety In The...
1.33K
84
29
15
15
0
On Tuesday morning, The New York Times’ “Morning Newsletter” said that since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, “Americans have accepted more harm to children in exchange for less harm to adults” in a piece titled, “No Way to Grow Up.” That is, of course, a true statement. Yet that admission left many conservatives frustrated for having warned of the damage that lockdowns were doing to kids for nearly two years, only to be met with ridicule and dismissive attitudes from leftist media and politicians.
“American children are starting 2022 in crisis,” NYT’s David Leonhardt opined in the newsletter, “I have long been aware that the pandemic was upending children’s lives. But until I spent time pulling together data and reading reports, I did not understand just how alarming the situation had become.”
“American children are starting 2022 in crisis,” NYT’s David Leonhardt opined in the newsletter, “I have long been aware that the pandemic was upending children’s lives. But until I spent time pulling together data and reading reports, I did not understand just how alarming the situation had become.”
New York Times Admits America Sacrificed Children’s Well-Being For Sake Of Adults’ Safety In The...
Posted from dailywire.com
Medical
Children
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
8
8
0
Somebody woke up the Times? Who cares? It’s only good for lining bird cages or as doggie-do places in one’s home.
(8)
(0)
7
7
0
Since this Pandemic started, it has been utter chaos because everyone seems to be an "EXPERT" on the Covid-19 virus... It is all utter B.S. as after 2 years, we are still no closer to getting rid of it... In my view, this is the opportunity the radical left wanted to condition (aka Indoctrinate) the masses of citizens to their way of thinking... Where is the SCIENCE to support what is going on? Just saying...
(7)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
At the end of the day President Trump was right: "The cure can't be worse than the virous". The science is on Trump's side, making the virus political issue was the bidding of our Democrat Party, Biden, and Harris.
(5)
(0)
6
6
0
Keeping children from school is the most pitiful actions our country has ever done; a close second is how we deserted our citizens in Afghanistan. The first year of the Wuhan Virus I can see because we just did not know if it affected children the same way as adults. After the data started rolling in there was no excuse for it. Unfortunately for our children, Biden, Harris, and the Democrat Party decided to make the virus a political event to win the presidential election. I would submit the virus was the only reason Biden took the presidency.
(6)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
SFC Casey O'Mally - I disagree. Hate votes are not concentrated in votes for one particular candidate. Trump was hated in 2016 too (the media and Democrats did their best to make sure of it). I didn't like Trump in 2016 either and I didn't vote for him. I know only a few people who did. Of those people who hated Trump, only one of them voted for Hillary. The others voted for some third party candidate or wrote in someone.
Yes, there were hate votes that went Biden's way, but not enough to make 81 million votes total.
Yes, there were hate votes that went Biden's way, but not enough to make 81 million votes total.
(1)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi - You are making good points, and yes many people saw Trump for change. He wasn't hated by all (I did dislike him in 2016 but by 2020 I saw that despite some character flaws he was actually a good president) and many people have been big Trump supporters from day 1. It can be argued that Obama's presidency paved the way for Trump's victory.
That being said, my point was that hatred of one candidate doesn't equate to millions and millions more votes. Obama in 2008 had a record 69 million votes because many people wanted change as well. He was charismatic and the Democrats loved him. 69 million votes. Trump was also fairly charismatic and a candidate of change, and I think it's safe to say that Hillary was more hated than John McCain (who was very moderate; if anything, he was possibly hated more by the right than by the left). Despite all that going for Trump (hope, change, charisma, outside the establishment, running against someone hated, etc), he didn't get nearly as many votes as Obama did in 2008. In context, there is no way Biden got 81 million votes (11 million more than charismatic hope and change Obama). He didn't campaign, he is probably the least charismatic presidential nominee in decades, got very low rally attendance when he actually held rallies, he was running against a popular president (albeit a president against whom the media tripled their efforts in running slander propaganda), and he was clearly showing mental acuity issues. No way Biden got 81 million legal legit votes.
That being said, my point was that hatred of one candidate doesn't equate to millions and millions more votes. Obama in 2008 had a record 69 million votes because many people wanted change as well. He was charismatic and the Democrats loved him. 69 million votes. Trump was also fairly charismatic and a candidate of change, and I think it's safe to say that Hillary was more hated than John McCain (who was very moderate; if anything, he was possibly hated more by the right than by the left). Despite all that going for Trump (hope, change, charisma, outside the establishment, running against someone hated, etc), he didn't get nearly as many votes as Obama did in 2008. In context, there is no way Biden got 81 million votes (11 million more than charismatic hope and change Obama). He didn't campaign, he is probably the least charismatic presidential nominee in decades, got very low rally attendance when he actually held rallies, he was running against a popular president (albeit a president against whom the media tripled their efforts in running slander propaganda), and he was clearly showing mental acuity issues. No way Biden got 81 million legal legit votes.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
SPC (Join to see) - Never underestimate the power of making the voting rules. It worked real well here in Pa. for them. The SCOTUS didn't accept the case because they knew they would have to rule in favor throwing out illegal votes, and if they did that there would be rioting in the streets. MHO
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google