Avatar feed
Responses: 3
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
3
3
0
Awesome ruling.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
3
3
0
Bad ruling, IMHO. If it was done to intentionally disenfranchise blacks, which is nowhere discussed in this article, then sure. But realistically, making every district 27% black would be the "proper" way to go, if we really want to discuss race. I haven't seen the map, but SCOTUS has already rules that PARTISAN gerrymandering is perfectly legal, it is RACIAL gerrymandering that is a no-go. And the plaintiffs have to PROVE that it was racial and not partisan. A simple "we should have more by the numbers" does not meet that threshold, yet this is what the judge ruled.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Dennis Loberger
0
0
0
This is not surprising in its construction or the ruling
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close