4
4
0
I had heard about the exchange but had no details. Here they are. I have my own opinion on the topic.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
1SG Dan Capri, LTC (Join to see)
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
1SG Dan Capri, LTC (Join to see)
Democrats, Judge Jackson, and the 'woman' problem
Posted from washingtonexaminer.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Biology
Supreme Court Biology
Edited 2 y ago
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 3
4
4
0
If Judge Jackson wasn't prepared for the very obvious questions that Marsha Blackburn posed, then how can she negotiate the weighty questions that she would face as a United States Supreme Court Justice?
(4)
(0)
2
2
0
She is clearly unqualified and if Democrats go ahead and confirm, it proves beyond the shadow of a doubt their interests do not favor the wellbeing of America or the citizens.
(2)
(0)
0
0
0
Actually taking the exchange from the rights perspective it didn’t go well but if you take it from the perspective of the Law she was dead on. And yes, a biologist is the correct answer in determining who or what a woman or man is.
And wasn’t it Blackburn that didn’t know the difference between the constitution and the bill of rights? Or was that a different idiot female republican?
And wasn’t it Blackburn that didn’t know the difference between the constitution and the bill of rights? Or was that a different idiot female republican?
(0)
(0)
SGT Mark Sullivan
Naturally it takes a Democrat to not realize, or ignorantly not know that the Constitution houses the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a Separate document, but was added as part of the Constitution in 1791. If you would have read the Federalist Papers, Federalist #84. The Anti-Federalsist felt it necessary to add enumerated Bill of Rights because the Constitution did not add them. The Bill of Rights was added so the Constitution could be ratified. So, you could feasibly reason that for the Constitution to be Ratified the Bill of Rights had to be added, therefore a part of the Constitution. https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-constitution/ As far as Jackson being unable to define a woman, Evolutionary Biologists have confirmed that a Woman is an Adult Human Female. https://youtu.be/eK6Pumbw7p4 Any scientist that claims differently is a Political Activist, and has sold themselves out for the Woke mind Virus
The Constitution | The White House
Why a Constitution? The need for the Constitution grew out of problems with the Articles of Confederation, which established a “firm league of friendship” between the States, and vested most power in a Congress of the Confederation. This power was, however, extremely limited—the central government conducted diplomacy and made war, set weights and measures, and…
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google