Posted on Jun 21, 2022
Texas GOP's new platform says Biden didn't really win. It also calls for secession
1.15K
72
29
12
12
0
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/20/ [login to see] /texas-gops-new-platform-says-biden-didnt-really-win-it-also-calls-for-secession
Well I Guess at Least they are Consistent from 1860!
Well I Guess at Least they are Consistent from 1860!
Texas GOP's new platform says Biden didn't really win. It also calls for secession
Posted from npr.org
State of Texas
Republicans
Election 2020
Voting
Edited 2 y ago
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 9
5
5
0
Like it or not many Democratic Governors illegally changed the 2020 Election Procedures that were later certified as true. Speaking of the one I know the best: The SCOTUS was required to hear the case again Pa. but they refused. I personally believe they didn’t hear it because they knew they found have to rule against Pa. and were afraid of the social nd political consequences the would have occurred from the ruling. I lost a lot of respect for them.
(5)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
MSG Roy Cheever Some really funky stuff went on in the 2020 election. My family is still receiving filled out applications for mail/drop box ballots from some nonprofit. I would like to know how they’re getting all my personal information.
(1)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SFC (Join to see)
You stated, "The SCOTUS was required to hear the case again Pa. but they refused."
Let me stop you right there. Perhaps I misunderstand you but if you think the SCOTUS is required to take that case, or any other, your fundamental understanding of our legal system is ... a bit lacking.
You claim things are illegal. The Constitutional arbiter of that is the Judiciary. For the most part they don't agree with you and they are the ones, higher and lower courts, who have the authority to declare what is and is not legal.
You stated, "The SCOTUS was required to hear the case again Pa. but they refused."
Let me stop you right there. Perhaps I misunderstand you but if you think the SCOTUS is required to take that case, or any other, your fundamental understanding of our legal system is ... a bit lacking.
You claim things are illegal. The Constitutional arbiter of that is the Judiciary. For the most part they don't agree with you and they are the ones, higher and lower courts, who have the authority to declare what is and is not legal.
(3)
(0)
5
5
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel The Texas sun must have gotten to these idiots! Once they succeed from the union will they apply for aid from the US Government to keep their Country solvent?
(5)
(0)
3
3
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google