Posted on Mar 23, 2023
First unit gets new Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicles replacing old M113s
375
38
13
13
13
0
Edited 1 y ago
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 4
6
6
0
I guess my old 113 will now be a target on some range now, if it's not sold to some country. I had a love/hate relationship with those tracks.
(6)
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
You and me both. We were swimming our tracks at Ft. Knox when I was a plt. ldr. in D/10th Cav., 194th Armd. Bde. (Sep.) in the spring of '80. Note my baby-faced 17-year-old driver. . . .
(1)
(0)
SPC Gary C.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. - I had Basic at Knox, D-19-4, Oct-Dec 1979. Then after Christmas down to Mother Benning for AIT.
Is the guy on your photo left holding a LAW, and acting like he's going to fire it out of the cargo hatch ?
Is the guy on your photo left holding a LAW, and acting like he's going to fire it out of the cargo hatch ?
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
C Co., 3-1st Inf., 11th LIB, Americal from late July to early Dec. '70, when they made me a combat correspondent/photographer. Sadly, our AO was one of the most heavily inundated with Agent Orange between Aug. and Nov. '70--saddling me with numerous Agent Orange conditions. . . .
(2)
(0)
3
3
0
WHY? It sounds like a waste of money to me, and why do designers insist on making armored Viks so tall. A low profile is better, and safer for all. I get ground clearance.
(3)
(0)
SPC David Dupey
I don't know why redesigning the 113 with better armor and weapons was a bad idea.i must not be in the same reality as the think newer is better if emp hits all the new stuff will be junk but per 1985 will still work so new is over rated to me
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google