Posted on Sep 30, 2023
The first impeachment inquiry hearing into Biden was six hours. Here's what happened
848
56
18
15
15
0
https://www.npr.org/2023/09/28/ [login to see] /biden-impeachment-inquiry-hearing
In the first impeachment inquiry for President Biden, Republicans zeroed in on his son, Hunter, and attempted to make the case that the president benefitted from his son's business dealings.
What resulted was a more than six-hour-long hearing that was at times both chaotic and antagonistic. At the same time, House Republicans struggled to prove their case against the president or his family.
House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer said the panel had "uncovered a mountain of evidence" and claimed Biden used his official government role for his family's gain. But Comer and his Republican colleagues didn't provide clear evidence backing up this massive allegation of wrongdoing.
In the first impeachment inquiry for President Biden, Republicans zeroed in on his son, Hunter, and attempted to make the case that the president benefitted from his son's business dealings.
What resulted was a more than six-hour-long hearing that was at times both chaotic and antagonistic. At the same time, House Republicans struggled to prove their case against the president or his family.
House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer said the panel had "uncovered a mountain of evidence" and claimed Biden used his official government role for his family's gain. But Comer and his Republican colleagues didn't provide clear evidence backing up this massive allegation of wrongdoing.
The first impeachment inquiry hearing into Biden was six hours. Here's what happened
Posted from npr.org
Joe Biden
Republicans
Business
Government
Posted 8 mo ago
Responses: 7
11
11
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel good day Brother William, always informational and of the most interesting. Thanks for sharing, have a blessed day!
(11)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL Republicans Making a Cluster F**k Out of Our System of Government.
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
5
5
0
Of course Democrats and their friends in the media are mislabeling the hearing. All three witnesses said their is enough evidence to conduct an inquiry which was the point of the hearing. There is circumstantial evidence of selling of influence such as a Chinese business partner of Hunter’s named Li, sent $250,000 to Hunter with the address of Joe’s house on the wire transaction. Just so happens Joe had lunch with Li and wrote recommendations for Li’s son and daughter to get into US colleges. Coincidence? Joe just happened to call Hunter 20 times during business meetings. Coincidence? Deven Archer said the Biden family was the brand. Ask if that included Jill, Archer said no. Asked if it was the illusion of access, Archer said it was more nuanced, there were touch stones. Were touch stones events like, lunch with Hunter’s business clients or future clients? A phone call in to a business meeting? A round of golf with future clients like Carlos slim? The point is to find out if this is just coincidence or real influence pedaling. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-republicans-devon-archer-transcript-hunter-biden-joe-biden-calls/#:~:text=Archer%20testified%20that%20Hunter%20Biden,it.%22%20Then%2C%20Rep.
(5)
(0)
LTC David Brown
MSgt Earl King - I listed CBS as my source for Archer saying Joe Biden’s interacting with Hunter Biden’s clients was nuanced. I do not just source Fox. I did watch the hearing, did you?
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
PV2 Larry Sellnow - I am willing to bet the House gets stone walled. The House has no enforcement mechanisms for subpoenas.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
MSgt Earl King - nothing is wrong with me, but at least I don’t seem to be blind and avoid ad hominem attacks.
(0)
(0)
COL Randall C.
MSgt Earl King - Comments violating community standards have been removed. Keep it respectful.
As a reminder, you can advocate for your position forcefully and demean the other's position as much as you like. However, personal attacks are not allowed.
If you need a refresher of what the primary Community Standards for discourse between RP Members is, you can read them at https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/enforcement-of-rallypoint-community-standards-2020-03-13-10-21-35 and https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/rallypoint-answers-and-discussion-conduct-2020-03-13-10-21-35
As a reminder, you can advocate for your position forcefully and demean the other's position as much as you like. However, personal attacks are not allowed.
If you need a refresher of what the primary Community Standards for discourse between RP Members is, you can read them at https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/enforcement-of-rallypoint-community-standards-2020-03-13-10-21-35 and https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/rallypoint-answers-and-discussion-conduct-2020-03-13-10-21-35
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google