Avatar feed
Responses: 5
LTC Trent Klug
3
3
0
Once again, the equity, er, excuse me, equality pushers found out the hard way that there are physical differences between the semester. But they just can't admit defeat.

SMA Dailey is to blame for this crap. He just had to have cross-fit added in. A waste of money, time, and resources.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
4 mo
Sir, this is the second time around for non-gender specific MOS tiered PT test, they tried it back in the Early 90's, just never got out of the test units that time. I'll dig and see if I still have any specifics, but my recollection was it was strength oriented like this last one, don't remember it requiring a lot of equipment.
The same things killed it the last time. The failure rate for female soldiers was pretty high, but the big thing was that MOS tiered PT Test would have kept females out of a lot of the MOS they wanted to open to women.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
4 mo
You're both right . . .
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Roger Ayscue
3
3
0
NO, NO, NO...... IF the Army is all about opening all MOS to both genders then there needs to be ONE standard, the highest of the two, and everyone should meet it.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
4 mo
That response gets my unqualified support!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Russell S.
2
2
0
Edited 4 mo ago
After being told for years there is no difference now there is still a difference. So again real women and pretend women will still get lower minimums to do the same jobs. Wish the left could decide what standards they want.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
4 mo
They are incapable of taking a firm stand, so don't hold your breath . . .
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close