Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
3
3
0
This is precisely the point and exactly what is going on. It has nothing to do with justice and the enforcement of the law. These prosecutors only want to prevent Trump from becoming President again and all of this has only increased what started out as apathy towards him, to fully supporting and even respecting Trump for taking on this fight. If Democrats wonder in November how Trump managed to succeed, they’ll only have themselves to blame for not denouncing these clearly politically motivated actions through our court system. I get that the actions or the indifference to use the courts by Democrat “leaders” is not necessarily a reason for one to change their fundamental political perspectives and vote with the other parties, but they ARE allowing this to fester.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
15 d
'Struth!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Dale Johnson
2
2
0
They have to walk a wobbly tightrope, not an easy issue to settle. Yes like cited President Obama ordered a strike that killed civilians, should he be brought to justice for what was supposed to be hitting a military target? He authorized it, was this from bad information about the target or bad target aquisition?

I am sure most every President has made a decision that could be called into question, do we want a President who has to second guess himself? That would almost make the Office of the Presidency unable to tale action.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
15 d
'Perzactly . . .
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Edward Riddle
2
2
0
Edited 15 d ago
Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch is no dummy Brother Dale. Extreme caution is warranted in this situation. I can see absolute immunity in some instances but not others.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
15 d
As can I . . .
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close