Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SSG William Jones
5
5
0
Wow... conflicted opinions will abound!!!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Trent Klug
3
3
0
I'm okay with this ruling.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Douglas Chrysler
1
1
0
Shouldn't it be only if a firearm is used in the course of a felony?
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Justin Bowen
PO3 Justin Bowen
12 mo
Yup. People convicted of child rape, sexual assault, stalking, arson, sedition, terrorism, assault, homicide and other violent and very serious felonies should all have the right to purchase firearms as long as their crimes didn't involve firearms. All of them.

That is literally your argument.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
SGT (Join to see)
12 mo
I don't think so Doug. There are a lot of implements that can be used to injure others that are not firearms. I think the "Dangerous Person" is the proper way to go. There will still be some that slip through even using that as a standard. Often a person's past actions are not admissible as evidence.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPL Douglas Chrysler
CPL Douglas Chrysler
12 mo
PO3 Justin Bowen I'm not arguing, I'm defending my own right to bear arms. The worst crime I ever committed was Jaywalking when I was 4 but to hear the description of my deed you would think the neighbors were describing Jack the Ripper.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Justin Bowen
PO3 Justin Bowen
12 mo
CPL Douglas Chrysler - Read the article. It's literally about a...felon.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close