Posted on Feb 25, 2025
Gun Control Lawmaker Makes Actual Threats of Public Violence in Congress
3.59K
43
11
12
12
0
My comment, "In February 2025, Representative Robert Garcia, a Democrat representing California, generated controversy through his assertion that Democrats should "bring actual weapons" to their political disagreements. He stated that the American populace desires them to introduce "actual weapons to this bar fight," characterizing the situation as a genuine struggle for democracy and the nation's future. While Representative Garcia subsequently characterized his statement as figurative, he initially reinforced the remarks during a congressional hearing that involved Elon Musk and the Trump administration. This transpired despite his advocacy for stringent gun control measures, such as the prohibition of modern sporting rifles and the implementation of universal background checks."
Gun Control Lawmaker Makes Actual Threats of Public Violence in Congress
Posted from nssf.org
Gun Control
2nd Amendment
Protest
Posted 9 mo ago
Responses: 5
12
12
0
Trump is disassembling the deep state. They will not concede without a fight.
(12)
(0)
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD
My surprise comes that this was said in public on more than one occasion. The First Amendment protects advocacy for armed protest participation, legal risks arise if the rhetoric crosses into incitement, facilitates intimidation, or directly enables violations of firearm laws. Courts would scrutinize whether the speech was directed toward unlawful action and whether it posed an imminent threat. The courts would have to decide.
CMSgt (Join to see)
CMSgt (Join to see)
(4)
(0)
SSgt Robert Simonds
IFrom someone who was in many political riots as an offical observer Maitin luthe and many others democrats was sble to inflame the people end his talk and have cause follow.. That as far as I'm concerned isn't covered under the guise of free speech. Any more than a riot is.
(3)
(0)
AN Ron Wright
the full hypocrisy is just outstanding though If a republican said those words there would be no other news for the rest of the week as MSM laid their lies on so heavy
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
It's ok if they do it, but someone even threatens online a thousand miles away you and I get blamed for their words and actions.
(4)
(0)
SSgt Robert Simonds
ya know! for all those with gender problems they might try milking a bull. sudden wake up ca;;
(2)
(0)
3
3
0
SPC Daley, I Totally agree with the first amendment. I believe in free speech but I also believe that you should be held accountable for the contents. If you call your neighbor an SOB that’s your right to do so but I think that you should be able to prove it if called to.
(3)
(0)
A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney
EXACTLY & Penalties Should Be Imposed If Statements Are Proven To Be Untrue.
To Avoid Telling A Lie And It Often Happens, Is To Preface The Statement With :
"In My OPINION" ~ And "Fk-off" Is Not An Opinion, It's An Instructional Sentence.
To Avoid Telling A Lie And It Often Happens, Is To Preface The Statement With :
"In My OPINION" ~ And "Fk-off" Is Not An Opinion, It's An Instructional Sentence.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google