Posted on Jun 24, 2025
President Trump Absolutely Obliterates AOC After She Calls for His Impeachment Following Bombing...
983
171
37
23
23
0
Edited 6 mo ago
Posted 6 mo ago
Responses: 10
So sick of that fruit cake. AOC stands for "Annoying Obnoxious Clown". This may draw fire, but I don't care.
(16)
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - It takes a lot to top MTG and I would like them both on an island with cameras and out of Congress.
(1)
(0)
LTC Stephen Conway
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen I let Stupid AOC and Tlaib have it. I Told Tlaib She is full of Sierra. I now go troll Leftist Congesswoman's page. It is so much fun. Trolling https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EVoxs1Y8F/
https://photos.app.goo.gl/bPEkWWW7jNazoYV36
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth COL Randall C. LTC Marc King Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt (Join to see) SGT Mary G. PO3 Edward Riddle LTC Trent Klug Sgt (Join to see) Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
https://photos.app.goo.gl/bPEkWWW7jNazoYV36
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth COL Randall C. LTC Marc King Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt (Join to see) SGT Mary G. PO3 Edward Riddle LTC Trent Klug Sgt (Join to see) Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
(3)
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
LTC Stephen Conway I can't waste my time with her. She wants all the perks of being a citizen and elected representative, but supports terror groups, and wants a socialist country.
(4)
(0)
While both Democratic and Republican Presidents have been criticized for using the military to take action against foreign adversaries, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez might want to read the text of the War Powers Resolution (WPR - aka the War Powers Act)*.
Presidents have used tenuous ties to the the Authorization for Use of Military Force that was passed after 9/11 as legal justification (when they bother to give any as required by the WPR) as it is so broad that you can fly a B-2 bomber through it:
"That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."
I'm curious what exactly is an impeachable offence.
It may be objectionable to some members of Congress, especially those, regardless if they do or don't belong to the same political party of the President, that disagree with the current and past President's view that their Article 2 powers allow them to act unilaterally in small-scale operations as long as they notify Congress within the required 48-hour period.
However, it being an "impeachable offense" is pushing the bounds of partisanship into clear stupidity.
I do agree with CSM Chuck Stafford about punching down from the podium.
People should try and not get too upset about partisan politicians making wild claims and spouting 'party line' rhetoric. They are just doing what partisan politicians do.
You don't get upset when a dog pees on a fire hydrant, do you? They are doing what dogs do.
-----------------------------------
* 50 USC Chapter 33 (War Powers Resolution) - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-33
* Authorization for Use of Military Force - https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ40/PLAW-107publ40.pdf
Presidents have used tenuous ties to the the Authorization for Use of Military Force that was passed after 9/11 as legal justification (when they bother to give any as required by the WPR) as it is so broad that you can fly a B-2 bomber through it:
"That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."
I'm curious what exactly is an impeachable offence.
It may be objectionable to some members of Congress, especially those, regardless if they do or don't belong to the same political party of the President, that disagree with the current and past President's view that their Article 2 powers allow them to act unilaterally in small-scale operations as long as they notify Congress within the required 48-hour period.
However, it being an "impeachable offense" is pushing the bounds of partisanship into clear stupidity.
I do agree with CSM Chuck Stafford about punching down from the podium.
People should try and not get too upset about partisan politicians making wild claims and spouting 'party line' rhetoric. They are just doing what partisan politicians do.
You don't get upset when a dog pees on a fire hydrant, do you? They are doing what dogs do.
-----------------------------------
* 50 USC Chapter 33 (War Powers Resolution) - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-33
* Authorization for Use of Military Force - https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ40/PLAW-107publ40.pdf
(15)
(0)
CPL Douglas Chrysler
There are plenty of fires here for them to relieve themselves on without contaminating the fire hydrant.
(5)
(0)
PO3 Edward Riddle
MAJ Byron Oyler - I think you can stay retired for President Trump's time in office Brother Byron. He really doesn't want war, believe it or not.
(3)
(0)
Impeachment is not a criminal proceeding. The Constitution does not define high crimes and misdemeanors. They are whatever the house of representatives decides they are in any given case. Impeachment is an administrative/political act.
Rep Ocasio-Cortez can quite legitimately call for impeachment and even submit for a vote on articles of impeachment.to tailor an old expression "you can impeach a ham sandwich." And I honestly hope she does. It will only serve to highlight the lunacy of the left fringe.
What Rep Ocasio-Cortez fails to understand is that we have been at a state of war since the 1972 Munich Olympics. It is not a war of out choosing, we (the western world) have exercised restraint. Restraint has achieved nothing. What the militant Muslim world (not all Muslim states are militant) has to do to win is not lose. It is long past time to make them lose.
Rep Ocasio-Cortez can quite legitimately call for impeachment and even submit for a vote on articles of impeachment.to tailor an old expression "you can impeach a ham sandwich." And I honestly hope she does. It will only serve to highlight the lunacy of the left fringe.
What Rep Ocasio-Cortez fails to understand is that we have been at a state of war since the 1972 Munich Olympics. It is not a war of out choosing, we (the western world) have exercised restraint. Restraint has achieved nothing. What the militant Muslim world (not all Muslim states are militant) has to do to win is not lose. It is long past time to make them lose.
(9)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
She clearly stated his actions were “illegal”. So wow, she may still be able to impeach her ham sandwich, premise is 100% wrong and the constituents that vote for her are essentially extensions of her lack of intelligence here.
(4)
(0)
LTC Stephen Conway
PO3 Edward Riddle That Is why I call her Stupid/Mensa (Spanish for Stupid) A.O. C. Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth COL Randall C. Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt (Join to see) SGT Mary G. PO3 Edward Riddle LTC Trent Klug
(3)
(0)
Read This Next

Political Opinions
