Avatar feed
Responses: 5
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
9
9
0
Cut corners ? How about a massive cover up of Secretary Clintons unlawful conduct and mishandling Classified Information on a massive level. If any of us had done the same thing We would have gone to prison. Comey Himself is a disgusting example of an FBI Director owned by corrupt politicians.
(9)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
Lt Col Charlie Brown
5 mo
Just as you said, if any military person had done what Hilary Clinton did, they would be in prison for a very long time.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Thomas Currie
MSG Thomas Currie
5 mo
I really loved the official DOJ statement that Clinton was apparently too stupid to understand any of the security briefings that she signed off as having attended or read and therefore did not know she had a responsibility to keep secret information secure.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC David Brown
8
8
0
All of this is horrible. Comey vindicated Clinton then Weiner’s lab top ended up in New York City police custody due to Weiner sending dick pics of himself to under age girls. Yes there was classified material on the computer NYPD did not have anyone with adequate credentials to review. Comey was slobbering to lick Democrats boots.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Charles Morris
0
0
0
Grassley’s framing of the Clinton investigation oversimplifies what the DOJ Inspector General and FBI records actually show. The OIG’s 2018 report—spanning over 500 pages—did not find political bias or intentional negligence in the handling of the Clinton email case. It found procedural inconsistencies and judgment errors, but no evidence that those decisions were driven by partisan motives.

Comey’s decision to announce the closure of the case publicly was in fact criticized by the OIG as a breach of Department norms—done without DOJ authorization and damaging to both Clinton and institutional credibility. That contradicts the idea of deliberate leniency.

As for the thumb drives and “foreign intelligence” claims, the record shows those drives contained email copies already reviewed through other channels. FBI forensics confirmed the contents were duplicates, and there was no suppression of foreign intelligence leads—simply a lack of corroboration that justified additional resource expenditure.

Comparing this investigation to the Trump-Russia probe is also misleading. The Clinton case was a completed, document-based investigation of mishandling procedures; the Russia probe was a counterintelligence case involving foreign interference, governed under different authorities. The notion that one was “full-throated” and the other “negligent” ignores the fundamentally different investigative mandates.

If anything, both episodes reveal institutional imbalance—how the FBI’s leadership decisions can skew political perception even when internal findings don’t support bias. That’s the nuance Grassley’s narrative omits.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close