Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SSG Roger Ayscue
2
2
0
NO, NO, NO...... IF the Army is all about opening all MOS to both genders then there needs to be ONE standard, the highest of the two, and everyone should meet it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
12 mo
That response gets my unqualified support!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
1
1
0
I have long advocated for a gender AND age neutral PT test with standards determined by 5 digit MOS. Quite simply, the physical expectations for a 11B1O, a 11B50, a 88M1O and a 92G3O are all different. Yes, there should be a basic minimum across the board. But I am far more worried about the max lift for an artilleryman or tanker who has to move heavy rounds than an infantryman. But I am more worried about SUSTAINED weight carry for an I factory than the others. And for cooks, I ain't worried about none of it, aside from basic fitness. Same for intel analysts. Or CSMs, regardless of branch.

Anyone holding a specific job should have the same fitness standard, regardless of age or sex. Either you can do the job or you can't.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
12 mo
Agreed . . .
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
12 mo
When I was commander of HHC, 2-34th AR, my cooks (including the E-6s and E-7s) would drop out of our morning runs and sneak in the back of the DFAC and hide out. I told my XO to lead the next run and the 1st Sgt. and I stayed well back and followed the cooks into the DFAC.

Once inside, I informed them I wanted them in my office immediately after lunch. They had recently given us the Summarized Art. 15 as a means to punish without creating a permanent black mark on a soldier's record.

That afternoon I informed the four E-6s and one E-7 that I was giving them Summarized Art. 15s and they would need to move into the barracks for two weeks beginning Sunday and they would be pulling extra duty throughout the period. I also advised them they had the right to appeal the punishment to the battalion CO. Only one did, the E-7. He came back that afternoon with his tail between his legs. . . .
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj John Bell
1
1
0
Are the enemy going to use:
_ gender-specific weapons?
_ gender specific obstacles and barricades?
_etc. etc. etc.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
12 mo
Of course not . . .
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
12 mo
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. - Well, that's just misogyny on their part.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close