Posted on Feb 13, 2018
Bill, Melinda Gates turn attention toward poverty in America
1.2K
12
11
2
2
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 3
Education is... Money is not... Two of my closest friends are high school teachers. One teaches in an inner city school in Arizona. The other teaches in a rural school in northern Michigan. They do not know each other (no collusion or group think). They both think the single biggest factor in scholastic achievement is parental involvement and attitude toward education. Extremely high correlation. Kids whose parents value education, are involved in the school and monitor homework, do well; despite household income, parental marital status, parental education level , parental intellectual acuity, parental ethnicity, peer group associations, intellectual capacity (within the norm) and any other variable you want to bring up.
Kids whose parents have a bad attitude toward education or are uninterested, are far less likely to achieve more than minimal standards. Those that do are often found to have some adult role model who is filling the mentorship role. Furthermore, they have seen huge swings in academic performance when the household parental dynamic changes, and an adult with a positive and involved attitude toward education enters the scene; step-Mom, step-Dad, significantly older step sibling. Kids, under age 12-13, whose household parental dynamic takes a turn for the worse in regards to attitude toward education, almost invariably lose their way.
The friend who teaches in Arizona goes further; she believes that the addition of a firm, but kind, adult male role model who values and is involved in a child's education can salvage virtually anyone with two or three years of high school left no matter how dysfunctional their relationship with the public schools and the education system has been.
Kids whose parents have a bad attitude toward education or are uninterested, are far less likely to achieve more than minimal standards. Those that do are often found to have some adult role model who is filling the mentorship role. Furthermore, they have seen huge swings in academic performance when the household parental dynamic changes, and an adult with a positive and involved attitude toward education enters the scene; step-Mom, step-Dad, significantly older step sibling. Kids, under age 12-13, whose household parental dynamic takes a turn for the worse in regards to attitude toward education, almost invariably lose their way.
The friend who teaches in Arizona goes further; she believes that the addition of a firm, but kind, adult male role model who values and is involved in a child's education can salvage virtually anyone with two or three years of high school left no matter how dysfunctional their relationship with the public schools and the education system has been.
(4)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
I taught for 9 years, in the public and private sector, the biggest difference was parental involvement. The public schools had twice the budget of the little private school but the private school had 100% parental involvement. During parent teacher conferences, at the public school I could count on about 40% of the parents showing up, at the private school I could count on 99% of the parents showing up and the one or two that could not make it would call or send me a note via the student, explain why and would want to know if they could meet another day. Money is great and it allows teachers to buy fancy gadgets and all but discipline and parental involvement means so much more.
(1)
(0)
Sgt Kelli Mays
Maj John Bell I agree. Parental involvement is a must...it's unfortunate that there tends to be a lot less parental involvement in inner city schools.
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
Sgt Kelli Mays - And I understand that for many inner city parents ITS GENUINELY TOUGH to be there and be involved. But finding a way is really important for the future of the kids.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Don Bigger
Agree. Throwing money at it won’t solve it because it’s a non-monetary problem. It’s a societal/cultural problem that can only be solved in the home. And there are very few people—and almost none in government—that are willing to (brave enough?) address that
(0)
(0)
Anyone besides me see the in this? A big rich liberal that surely supports the NEA leading the effort. Let me offer a simple low cost solution, go to the countries that top the list in student performance, decertify the NEA and eliminate the Department of Education, fund states on a per student basis for those attending public education institutions. States can be held accountable by the voter when performance is substandard.
(3)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood because it's so liberal there. he he he Okay...Parental involvement is a MUST...and is the key. Unfortunately, most inner city schools or schools in the more impoverished neighborhoods tend to have parents who do not get involved. If there is a way to get these parents more involved, there would be much improvement for these kids and their education...also, it's important for the parents to make sure home work is done and discipline is instilled at home...and I would guess that 1 or 2 out of 10 might have parents who make sure the home work is done...
(0)
(0)
Read This Next