Posted on Dec 21, 2021
Court Fight in Michigan Over Dead People on Voter Lists Heats Up
638
33
22
8
8
0
Posted in these groups: 
VotingState of Michigan
VotingState of Michigan
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 9
7
7
0
They don't belong on the rolls...if you are arguing to keep them- YOU ARE WRONG
(7)
(0)
MSG Thomas Currie
SFC Casey O'Mally - It seems that the state is arguing that they have no responsibility to DO anything to maintain the voter roles as long as they SAY they have some sort of program, plan, or policy -- regardless of whether that program, plan, or policy actually accomplishes anything.
No reasonable person expects any state to purge 100% of ineligible voters instantly or even quickly, but on the other hand, the Michigan position is that they don't have to show that they have done anything because the federal law fails to set any specific measurable standard.
No reasonable person expects any state to purge 100% of ineligible voters instantly or even quickly, but on the other hand, the Michigan position is that they don't have to show that they have done anything because the federal law fails to set any specific measurable standard.
(1)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
MSG Thomas Currie And while it is stupid, they are right
If there is no specific requirement to meet, then one cannot argue that they have failed to comply. Unless, of course, one can prove that they have purged NO ONE. Otherwise it is a question of degree, and with no specific requirement, one cannot say they have failed to comply.
Really the argument is that they haven't complied with what THAT PERSON thinks is a sufficient level of removal. Which is an opinion. Generally speaking, opinions are not enforceable by the courts. Especially not opinions of folks outside of government trying to force government to comply.
If there is no specific requirement to meet, then one cannot argue that they have failed to comply. Unless, of course, one can prove that they have purged NO ONE. Otherwise it is a question of degree, and with no specific requirement, one cannot say they have failed to comply.
Really the argument is that they haven't complied with what THAT PERSON thinks is a sufficient level of removal. Which is an opinion. Generally speaking, opinions are not enforceable by the courts. Especially not opinions of folks outside of government trying to force government to comply.
(1)
(0)
SFC Terry Stinnett
MSG Thomas Currie p perhaps instead of going with the limited information of a "news media" report, Michigan residents/voters can review the information provided by the DOS office on their methods. They routinely get death notice information from SSA and state health department and purges those voters. Similarly, they coordinate at county & city level with those election offices. More than once in my life I've met folks with the exact same name, not otherwise related to each other, who could potentially show up on the voter registration lists.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
A guy at the shop said his grandmother was sent three absentee ballots, and she had been dead 3 months MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. ,another guy said his dad was sent one, and he had been gone 4 years sir,
(2)
(0)
LTC David Brown
My brother was sent applications for an absentee ballots and he has been dead for a decade
(3)
(0)
1
1
0
The argument is “it’s too costly”! Well let’s see here how much would it cost to click a few keys snd do a nsme and birthday check to see if they pop on the ssa death certificate list!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google