Responses: 9
"Huge problem" for me. As was is 10-20 million to form a PAC to destroy careers of Cruz, Kasich and "possibly one other.." Because they didn't lick his boots. I can't close my eyes, hold my nose and cover my ears and vote for that. We have a very big problem.
(2)
(0)
LTC David Brown
But it is OK to undermine Bernie then hire the disgraced architect for your campaign?
(0)
(0)
If the Russians have those emails, does it matter? Secretary Clinton denies that they have any national security value. Let's take her at her word. I believe she said they were discussion of "the typical fare" about planning her daughter’s wedding, family vacations, and her “yoga routines.”
If the Russians have internal documents that cast a negative light on the machinations of the DNC, wouldn't the DNC rank and file want to know? Wouldn't they want to clean house and have a organization that represents the rank and file vs. a system that that attempts to pick winners while ignoring the rank and file? If I were a Democrat I'd be embarrassed that I had a "booger" showing, but glad for the opportunity to get rid of it.
I disagree with the article's interpretation of Mr. Trumps statement. Isn't it better to know what the enemy knows about you? Added benefit -- it will expose some of their collection methods, when no information of significant value was collected. Isn't it better to discover how they collected the low-value information. The lessons learned from the after-action report should lead us to better security measures.
So if the Russians have more emails, lets get them on the table. There is no point to keeping a secret from the Russian's if they already know the secret.
If the Russians have internal documents that cast a negative light on the machinations of the DNC, wouldn't the DNC rank and file want to know? Wouldn't they want to clean house and have a organization that represents the rank and file vs. a system that that attempts to pick winners while ignoring the rank and file? If I were a Democrat I'd be embarrassed that I had a "booger" showing, but glad for the opportunity to get rid of it.
I disagree with the article's interpretation of Mr. Trumps statement. Isn't it better to know what the enemy knows about you? Added benefit -- it will expose some of their collection methods, when no information of significant value was collected. Isn't it better to discover how they collected the low-value information. The lessons learned from the after-action report should lead us to better security measures.
So if the Russians have more emails, lets get them on the table. There is no point to keeping a secret from the Russian's if they already know the secret.
(1)
(0)
What? A hit piece against a Republican from MSNBC, now that is some serious journalism. Next thing we will hear is a thrill running up his leg for Hillary who compromised national security. Or a comment she will have more latitude after the elections, like Obama did.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next