5
5
0
"Will the Supreme Court blow up the presidential debate?"
There are a lot of things mentioned in this article, New Criterion just decided to bring the Presidential Immunity case to the front for the headline. "Chevron" and censorship also feature heavily in the upcoming announcements.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
There are a lot of things mentioned in this article, New Criterion just decided to bring the Presidential Immunity case to the front for the headline. "Chevron" and censorship also feature heavily in the upcoming announcements.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
Just a moment...
Posted from newcriterion.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Supreme Court
Posted 6 mo ago
Responses: 3
4
4
0
A lot on the table Brother Rick, I hope the 6 JAN BS is thrown out personally along with most of this election interference. Let them debate though I don't believe Joe can.
(4)
(0)
1
1
0
For some reason Trump doesn't count. For example, the governor of Washington is stock piling abortion drugs to redistribute to states in need just in case Trump wins the election. Inslee and his lap dog Bob are always saying no one is above the law and will pay the price if convicted. So, if abortion is against federal law it's ok to do it anyway if Trump is president. Go figure.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
SFC Casey O'Mally
SGT James Murphy You didn't answer the question though. Why don't *you* trust the court to do the right thing?
(0)
(0)
SGT James Murphy
SFC Casey O'Mally - They don't have a solid track record of doing the right thing. "Constitutionally" I suppor the Constitution AS WRITTEN!
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SGT James Murphy I would disagree.
No one bats 1.000. but I think the court has a pretty strong track record. Definitely better than 66/33. So I think giving them the benefit of the doubt is not a bad idea.
No one bats 1.000. but I think the court has a pretty strong track record. Definitely better than 66/33. So I think giving them the benefit of the doubt is not a bad idea.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google