Avatar feed
Responses: 7
Maj John Bell
3
3
0
Edited 8 y ago
I think the Western states are justifiably pissed off at the Federal Government. In Nevada's case, 84% of the land in the State is owned by the Federal Government. I do not know this for a fact, but my guess is that there was jury nullification. The jury knows a crime has been committed but does not care because they think the "victim got what he deserved". So they present a not guilty verdict. Remember the west is largely populated by the descendants of people that left Europe because of Europe's BS governments. Then East Coast BS, got to be too much, Then mid-West BS got to be too much. They stopped in Nevada, because California already had to much BS. The end result, Nevada has little tolerance for Federal BS. :) Manifest Destiny in a nutshell.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
PFC Jim Wheeler - A lot of the land was taken by treaties which were then broken, or by the Federal government demanding that Indians leave one reservation and move to another. If you were a white landowner, then yes... the government would most likely compensate you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Jim Wheeler
PFC Jim Wheeler
8 y
SSG (Join to see) - How long ago are we talking about here?
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Jim Wheeler
PFC Jim Wheeler
8 y
A1C Doug Towsley - I hear the same thing every time I try to talk politics with people.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt John McGowan
MSgt John McGowan
8 y
A1C. Hang in there Brother. Never give.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David Baker
1
1
0
Edited 8 y ago
Especially with a Portland jury! If it was made up of a representative sample of Portland residents, you might expect a verdict of So-Damn-Guilty-You-Should-Shoot-Them-All-In-The-Parking-Lot.

Must have had something to do with the evidence and the quality of the defense.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Owner
1
1
0
This was a little confusing to me as well.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close