Posted on Jan 11, 2016
Medals policy overhaul includes new 'C' device for combat
8.49K
7
13
3
3
0
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 3
I do agree that the "C" device provides an excellent alternative to handing out the Bronze Star. However, I still believe that should be limited to the Achievement or Commendation level of performance in a combat zone. If an individual earns the level of an MSM in a combat zone, this is by definition a Bronze Star.
In preparing the citation for one of my E-8s in Afghanistan, I had to push hard to defend his Bronze Star. What frustrated me was I looked to the local Army units' citations for examples and most were crap. Way too many Bronze Stars given out for Achievement/Commendation level work, in many cases using a cut and paste copy for the citations.
In the end, I was successful getting my SMSgt the BS after sitting down with the Command Chief during a visit to our FOB. Still, too many people who earned one within my unit weren't as fortunate. I despise the politics of the awards process sometimes.
In preparing the citation for one of my E-8s in Afghanistan, I had to push hard to defend his Bronze Star. What frustrated me was I looked to the local Army units' citations for examples and most were crap. Way too many Bronze Stars given out for Achievement/Commendation level work, in many cases using a cut and paste copy for the citations.
In the end, I was successful getting my SMSgt the BS after sitting down with the Command Chief during a visit to our FOB. Still, too many people who earned one within my unit weren't as fortunate. I despise the politics of the awards process sometimes.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
SSG (Join to see) - I appreciate that only, you need to understand cyber is now two parts. Support and operational. They are distinct capabilities with different skill sets. The services are finally recognizing this and are separating the two with regards to MOS/AFSC specialties. Over the last 6+ years the services have created multiple cyber ops units, which I assure you are not there to provide traditional IT support services. These units are fully into the discussions of their own TTPs and carrying out missions. Coupled with kinetic forces, they are providing lethal capabilities. HVTs have been identified and targeted through these means and the use effects based targeting (specifically going after the other guy's support) in many cases have come as a result of cyber. Those guys deserve to be recognized specifically for that work as most of them will never have an opportunity to earn a CAB/CIB or equivalent.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Im tracking im a 37F now and understand what your saying. I am looking to take on a 35 mos next and hope to pull off becoming a CW before 2022. God willing.
(1)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Good luck with that. I have to say I've been very happy with how many folks from different backgrounds are coming into cyber. My background is originally traditional comm, but quickly moved into IO, cyber, and even deployed comm. My specialty has been in in Cyber Operations for most of my career though, but the other experiences have helped me learned more about the operational environment before the services decided to make cyber part of it.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Thanks, I have 2 intel guys staffed with me right now and couldn't be happier with how they conduct business. I hope to continue rounding out my service with a wide range of skills. 37 was a jump let alone 35 stuff to come.
cheers Sir
cheers Sir
(0)
(0)
My father was in the Navy for three years during WWII, SGT (Join to see), spent half that time in the Pacific Ocean, and came home with four campaign medals. Just four. Wonder what he would have received in the services of today?! By the way, he was a LT(jg)!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next