Pennsylvania rejects 372K mail-in ballot applications following primary confusion: report

I credit the state of Pennsylvania which tends to be a blue state for their due diligence.

Awesome!PO2 Frederick Dunn

Excellent!

PO2 Frederick Dunn Excellent!

This is not about absentee ballots. This is about mail-in ballots where the state uses old voter registration records as well as address information they obtained from other sources and send it to the person described as living at a particular address. That person may not even be a legal resident of the United States, maybe a dog, a cat, a goldfish, or someone that is deceased. These are the mail-in ballots that the president is concerned with. Not absentee ballots where you have requested it and they have a counter signature to compare against. The other mail-in ballots are simply blind. If someone receives a mail-in ballot for example under the name of Bob Ritchie and votes but then also receives a mail-in ballot under the name of Robert Ricci and then votes that person has been voted twice. They've also committed election fraud. You see where I'm going with this? The state of Washington has been doing mail in balloting I believe for 10 years or maybe it's 20 and they've got it down pretty well. But to change the rules once voting had already begun this time is just wrong.