Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
1
1
0
Ok, But is it really necessary to inoculate 7 and 8 year olds for an STD?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
SGT (Join to see)
7 mo
MSG Stan Hutchison - Stan it is still an STD transmitted by sexual contact, so I ask again is it really necessary for ones so young.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 mo
SGT (Join to see) - As I posted above, it takes decades for chronic infection to lead to cancer. Do you believe 9-year-olds do not experiment with sex? If they get the shot at 9, it looks like they will be safe from then on. Better safe than sorry.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
7 mo
MSG Stan Hutchison - Also if that Child is Raped, Now on Top of the Trauma is the Much More increased chance of Cancer. I'm All for Children getting this Shot and Now not just the Girls since it Helps the Guys apparently!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 H Gene Lawrence
0
0
0
I’m a 6 year survivor of this insidious disease.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close