Responses: 3
It's a good piece as far as it goes, and I obviously understand why you'd wanted me to see it, honest, I do. Howecer, few pieces on the topic ever get into the really important aspects of where it applies, specifically, in everyday chemistry, or in standard solid state physics, however, for very definite reasons. One can create, quite readily relatistic quantum mechanics, however, the effect of combining both even on a cosmological scale is relatively insignificant, for the most part. There is made far too great a mystery of the whole topic, for the simple reason thst he Schrödinger equation, which was the real basis for it, improved in by the Idrac equation for photon wave functions, and certain other particle physics boundary value problems (BVPs), is rarely properly explained. He Bohr atom was the last classical approach to try to describe the hydrogen atom, and, to a limited extent, it did explain spectroscopic lines quite well. However, where it broke down, was that it ignored wave particle duality, which is the idea of being able to perceive the de Broglie wavelength of small subatomic particles, which do become quite visible near absolute zero. Matters waves exhibit interference, diffraction, and, I'm quite sure, refraction, at least I'd think refraction would apply, however, only near absolute zero, when the effect becomes overtly visible. That is, a fdiffraction grating, as well as wave interference patterns become visibly apparent for matter waves. Also, whatq happens in quantum mechanics, is that position and momentum are replaced by operators. Most people have a simplistic notion that serious math involves numbers, when it actually involves objects, mathematical physics deals with those mathematical objects that actually occur, as opposed to those that dont, and are purely theoretical, get necessary as a background theory for explaining this mathematical objects that actually do exist. Take the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, flawed German genius evil also, that Heisenberg was. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies in multiple physics contexts, between position vs momentum, angular position vs angular momentum, and between time and frequency, however it is merely based in the idea of Planck's constant, which I'd now seen derived recently by a European constant, based in the so called structural constant of an atom, which is a more basic constant still, I'll try to find the reference. There's really nothing mysterious about QM, without it, transistors wouldn't function, neurons likely wouldn't operate, chemical reactions wouldn't occur, he quantum numbers learned in high school chemistry wouldn't mean anything. QM describes particles as a probability density, essentially smapearing a particle, of you will, over a volume of space, that is then integrated over, to find the probability of finding a particle in a given volume. If a marble is rolling around in a cardboard box, and one can hear it, there',s Stoll a very real, albeit small, probability that the marble is, actually, in point of fact, not really in the box. Vanishingly small, yet nonzero, decreasing as the thickness of the cardboard walls increases, going to zero as the walls become infinitely thick, of course that's how the theory REALY functions, when it's REALY explained properly, I'd ne glad to elaborate further, if anyone would care to hear more, hope was of some value, many thanks.
(0)
(0)
Welcome to Simulation Theory and Quantum Entanglement of Wave Functions 101 PO1 Tony Holland and Capt Dwayne Conyers
(0)
(0)
Read This Next