Posted on Sep 10, 2021
US Military Courts Rules Bump Stocks Are Not Machine Guns
3.75K
82
20
20
20
0
Don't know what effect this will have in the civilian court system. As far as UCMJ goes, there is now precedent.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, MSgt David Hoffman,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
MSgt James Clark-Rosa, Lt Col Mark Avery
1SG Jason Hastings,
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SMSgt David A Asbury,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, MSgt David Hoffman,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
MSgt James Clark-Rosa, Lt Col Mark Avery
1SG Jason Hastings,
US Military Courts Rules Bump Stocks Are Not Machine Guns
Posted from ammoland.com
2nd Amendment
UCMJ
Law
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
9
9
0
Rules governing fire arms are established by Federal Law as the basis. BATF as part of DOJ will propose final implementing regulations. Those will go through a public comment period and once approved be issued in the CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
That is more or less the process. As 1SG Hastings points out we don't know which military court is involved. So it would be hard to speculate on what it means.
That is more or less the process. As 1SG Hastings points out we don't know which military court is involved. So it would be hard to speculate on what it means.
(9)
(0)
9
9
0
Considering a bump stock is an attachment to a weapon, and not a weapon itself, did this really need a judiciary opine?
(9)
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SSG Edward Tilton - Context does matter. Cars are perfectly legal as well, but when you up armor one and drive it through a school, you run into legal issues.
(4)
(0)
7
7
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google