Vice presidential debate fact check: Springfield, Project 2025, and Amber Thurman - Washington...

PO3 Edward Riddle - The thing is, it has worked for them in the past and there aren't any consequences. The candidate can say, "I won't use that person or media org because they proved they can't stick to the rules," but then the next moderator/media org does it. And of course, the Democrats currently refuse to go on venues like Fox, claiming they would be biased. While the GOP candidates should be credited for their willingness to go anywhere, they are not doing themselves any favors when they don't insist on more balanced venues (or a balance of venues). Even if that means to go on what is percieved as right leaning to balance the left leaning venues they are already going to. At this rate, we might as well make the likes of Sean Hannity and Rachel Madow the moderators, and stop kidding ourselves that there is balance or an absence of bias.

Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - I apologize for not addressing you properly Brother Mac.

Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - I agree with you wholeheartedly Brother Mac. I don't understand how each election time this isn't done. Each time it's the same thing, the dems say fox is biased so they won't debate on there. It's time to hold their feet to the fire., or don't debate at all. Period.

I'm with both of you . . .