Avatar feed
Responses: 3
PO3 Shayne Seibert
2
2
0
I never thought that Italy's navy was useless. They didn't use it to its full potential because no Navy went against them until late in the war, so by that token they didn't have the experienced sailors to fight their ships that the allies did, but that is really the only downside.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
1
1
0
Edited 12 mo ago
That guy is the hardest military historian to listen too. His metrics for the Italian Navy was their plan was, it was important, they were innovative, they were needed to. lol
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
12 mo
MAJ Ken Landgren I Often Put Him on to Go to Sleep By!
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
12 mo
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel - This is him talking about the US Navy in the Pacific:

The Japanese Navy was powerful, so the US Navy had to be strong. There was a need for the US Navy because there are many islands and space in the Pacific Region. The US Navy provided logistics for itself. The capital ship was the aircraft carrier and had an important role in the fight against the Japanese Imperial Navy. It had to provide logistics to army and marine units. lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
0
0
0
I have not seen the video, but will say that the Italian Navy is never mentioned in military history. Therefore, I assume they sucked! lol
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close