Should RallyPoint Members be required to supply at least one verifable part of the identity?

So what is up with the use of initials and no photo by some?

MAJ (Join to see) some people probably just want to reduce how much they're sharing. The verification I meant comes through documentation to RP staff, not through complete exposure of ones' info on a profile. LTC Yinon Weiss has shown examples of what un-verified members see when they view verified member's profiles, and it's pretty limited. It's been suggested that adding a function to our profiles 'view as' then 'verified member' or 'un-verified member' or 'contact' (like linked in does) so members could see for themselves how much of their info is available could be useful.

Good to know. That way the secret squalls can protect their acorns.

Well said. Thank you!

That is a valid point.

I feel as though I know so little about RP when I hear of features like this. Where is this profile bank with the little blue flag option? :)

CMSgt (Join to see) , when you visit a profile page, there is a little flag you can click on if you think it is bogus.

Oh, I see. I thought there was a general list format where you can scroll through profiles. Thank you for that.

I will keep my eye out for imposters. Fargin sneaky bastages!! :)

I saw a guy a few days ago listed as a former SMA - and I promise you - that dude was not on the list.