Posted on May 6, 2015
Are we creating a generation of entitled Veterans?
17.9K
102
64
7
7
0
Recently I was talking with my brother who works for a medical supply company. The topic of hiring Veterans came up.
He talked about how many of the veterans that his company hires are lazy, lack loyalty, and feel that they are entitled. They show up late, miss deadlines, and constantly need supervision.
The turn over rate for these veterans is significantly higher than other employees. These are not wounded veterans, whom his company makes accommodations for, nor are they combat vets. These are service members that have completed thier initial enlistment, many of whom never left the country.
Essentially, these vets feel and act as if they deserve a job, and that this company should feel privileged to have them work there.
So my question is, are we creating a generation of entitled Veterans?
Invite others to respond by typing @name
He talked about how many of the veterans that his company hires are lazy, lack loyalty, and feel that they are entitled. They show up late, miss deadlines, and constantly need supervision.
The turn over rate for these veterans is significantly higher than other employees. These are not wounded veterans, whom his company makes accommodations for, nor are they combat vets. These are service members that have completed thier initial enlistment, many of whom never left the country.
Essentially, these vets feel and act as if they deserve a job, and that this company should feel privileged to have them work there.
So my question is, are we creating a generation of entitled Veterans?
Invite others to respond by typing @name
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 30
Veterans aside, we are creating an entitled society period.
Too many are trying to push the envelope and definition of what being a veteran means. It used to be, not there are any regs on it, that a SM was considered a veteran for serving a tour in combat (or combat zone, now a days) or completed 20 years of honorable service. Just serving a single enlistment or mandatory service obligation w/o a combat patch, IMHO, does not constitute being a veteran, though I'm sure many will tell me otherwise.
Transitioning SM who expect a job solely on their merits as a SM are just living in fantasy land. There is no such thing. SMs SHOULD receive some additional consideration in job placement as a tie breaker, if they meet all the criteria and experience for the job but even that is wishful thinking sometimes.
Too many are trying to push the envelope and definition of what being a veteran means. It used to be, not there are any regs on it, that a SM was considered a veteran for serving a tour in combat (or combat zone, now a days) or completed 20 years of honorable service. Just serving a single enlistment or mandatory service obligation w/o a combat patch, IMHO, does not constitute being a veteran, though I'm sure many will tell me otherwise.
Transitioning SM who expect a job solely on their merits as a SM are just living in fantasy land. There is no such thing. SMs SHOULD receive some additional consideration in job placement as a tie breaker, if they meet all the criteria and experience for the job but even that is wishful thinking sometimes.
(16)
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
I apologize LCpl Mark Lefler if that is how it came across and I did not intend any disrespect. After reading the new post I stand corrected.
(1)
(0)
PO2 James Marlow
I agree with MAJ Petrarca up there. There will always be sad unhappy people who can only feel good about themselves by trying to tear others down. I once had a co-worker tell me that I'm not a real vet even though I deployed 4 times that my deployments didn't count because they were on Navy ships. That particular individual ended up being fired a short time later for being just a generally unpleasant person, so I guess karma won out.
(1)
(0)
1SG Cameron M. Wesson
SPC (Join to see) Kyle... I have the honor of serving with a few brothers and sisters who have never heard a shot fired in anger... Who supported operations that saved lives and are much a veteran than anyone else! You have my respect and thanks for your service
(2)
(0)
SFC William Farrell
I have to agree with some of the others Major, it doesn't matter whether you served in a combat theater or not, if you served you are a veteran. Those who indicate that you have to have served in combat to be a veteran are just trying to elevate themselves over others. Having served a year in Vietnam does not make me any better than someone who happened to serve four years doing their stateside duty in Rhode Island! We are veterans, period.
(0)
(0)
I'm unconvinced. The veterans I know and work with feel lucky they have a job, and NONE of us feel entitled to any position. Over-qualified, sometimes. But entitled? This is the first I'm hearing of it.
Frankly, veterans are lucky to have a job. In my area, veteran support is minimal, and does little to set us apart from other job seekers. Are we inherently better than other job candidates? not at all, and I've not heard this expressed except in specific employment related scenarios.
In my area, we have it about as hard as everyone else. We're not special, and employers are quick to let us know that by NOT hiring us. And we know it.
**I understand this is a small window into this issue. Just my perspective.
Frankly, veterans are lucky to have a job. In my area, veteran support is minimal, and does little to set us apart from other job seekers. Are we inherently better than other job candidates? not at all, and I've not heard this expressed except in specific employment related scenarios.
In my area, we have it about as hard as everyone else. We're not special, and employers are quick to let us know that by NOT hiring us. And we know it.
**I understand this is a small window into this issue. Just my perspective.
(9)
(0)
I personally think its a fallout of professionalism and discipline that starts in boot. My years we was taught to be where we needed to be and always be professional because that characteristic follows us throughout our lives. Saying that i cant speak on behalf of the few who make the many look but ..but even in we had our share of dbags who acted that way. So with all this said in the end its just people being people civilian or veteran laziness is everywhere...it depends on the mindset of the person
(5)
(0)
SCPO (Join to see)
What veterans is your brother hiring? I have always found the exact opposite and my company goes out of its way to find and hire veterans for the exact opposite reason of his company.
From working in the civilian World, it does not take long for veterans to fall into the habits of the people they work with and around...so if they are having laziness and loyalty, they may want to consider purchasing a good mirror? Additionally, the turn over rate might not be a reflection of the low quality of the veterans hired but of the company hiring them?
What veterans is your brother hiring? I have always found the exact opposite and my company goes out of its way to find and hire veterans for the exact opposite reason of his company.
From working in the civilian World, it does not take long for veterans to fall into the habits of the people they work with and around...so if they are having laziness and loyalty, they may want to consider purchasing a good mirror? Additionally, the turn over rate might not be a reflection of the low quality of the veterans hired but of the company hiring them?
(5)
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
Thanks 1SG Cameron M. Wesson. I found that if you tell you truth, you don't have to remember what you said...and that is normally true?
(2)
(0)
PO1 Michael Fullmer
This ENTIRE generation...with a very relative exception...feels as they are entitled. Â My opinion. Â From their first day at school the world owes them. Â Sorry, but I say EQUINE FECAL MATTER.Â
(1)
(0)
As someone who is transitioning into "retirement" right now, I've noticed the "We hire Veterans" label is, about 50% of the time, lip service. What it should say is "we hire QUALIFIED Veterans". That said and in answer to the question, yes, but I don't think it is new. Transition programs need to start emphasizing the importance of adjusting your sight picture in reference to civilian employment. A veteran will likely win the job over a civilian when applying for the same job with the same qualifications, but not against someone who is more qualified.
Talking to many recruiters and corporate mentors, part of the problem is service members get out thinking they deserve to walk right into a management position. What some fail to realize is this makes zero sense. In the military, we do not take a guy/gal straight out of basic training and make him/her an NCO no matter what their prior experience was. That individual may fast track through the ranks due to their previous experience, but they still have to learn the basics of the military in order to do so. Why would we expect a private company to hire someone with, often and likely, zero experience in their industry or business, and make them a leader without that person learning the basics? Granted, the more leadership time in the military and jobs you worked may get you in above an entry level, but I don't think it is something to expect. Just like in the military, you have to pay your dues first, then you get what you expect to come to you.
I spoke recently with a recently separated MAJ who is now an assistant project manager for a company fielding a military contract. He stated the company who hired him, known for being very veteran friendly, would not even look at someone E-8 - E-9, or LTC on up. Why? Because to get to that level, they have shifted from hands on supervision to delegation and oversight. That's not a bad thing, as that is normally what is required to obtain those ranks, but when transitioning from military to civilian, they are not able to switch back without major problems. In the corporate world, people in positions requiring delegation have been with that company just as long as that LTC has been in the military.
Talking to many recruiters and corporate mentors, part of the problem is service members get out thinking they deserve to walk right into a management position. What some fail to realize is this makes zero sense. In the military, we do not take a guy/gal straight out of basic training and make him/her an NCO no matter what their prior experience was. That individual may fast track through the ranks due to their previous experience, but they still have to learn the basics of the military in order to do so. Why would we expect a private company to hire someone with, often and likely, zero experience in their industry or business, and make them a leader without that person learning the basics? Granted, the more leadership time in the military and jobs you worked may get you in above an entry level, but I don't think it is something to expect. Just like in the military, you have to pay your dues first, then you get what you expect to come to you.
I spoke recently with a recently separated MAJ who is now an assistant project manager for a company fielding a military contract. He stated the company who hired him, known for being very veteran friendly, would not even look at someone E-8 - E-9, or LTC on up. Why? Because to get to that level, they have shifted from hands on supervision to delegation and oversight. That's not a bad thing, as that is normally what is required to obtain those ranks, but when transitioning from military to civilian, they are not able to switch back without major problems. In the corporate world, people in positions requiring delegation have been with that company just as long as that LTC has been in the military.
(5)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Trust me it's mostly Lip Service for the Retiree side of veterans......they want the 1st term guys......not folks that could come in and potentially take their jobs.....I had to dumb my resume down a lot just to start getting call backs and even then the interview process was always painful.....got asked stuff like "why do you need a job, you're retired" or "we feel with 20 years experience you're over qualified" and the list goes on. I can't speak to the "professional" side (doc, nurse, lawyer, etc) but from the para professional side it's rough...and even after you get hired you have to tread carefully so you immediate boss does not think you are hunting for their job. .....hell I was actually told at one interview "with 20 years experience we cant afford you".....my response was "don't look at it as you cant afford me look at it as i'm selling my skill sets to you at a discount"......actually was the job i ended up at......anyway brother good luck....it's an uphill battle but one that can be won if you keep pressing.
SFC Douglas Duckett
SFC Aaron Myall that is an interesting concept on why the company does not hire certain pay grade. I never considered that in my thought process. I am going to steal that if it is OK?
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
SFC Douglas Duckett Happy to help. I claim no Intellectual Property to any of my thought processes. Share away.
(2)
(0)
It's the generation. I'm a Tech School instructor and these kids show up from basic and think we owe them something.. they expect everything handed to them.
(3)
(0)
Frankly, I think your brother has it wrong. I'm confident in the larger surveys that have been done that prove out veteran's work reliability.
One survey found: “Nearly all (99%) of the surveyed employers agree – veterans perform as well or better than their civilian coworkers. Similarly, employers report that veterans perform as well or better than non-veterans in terms of career advancement,” http://www.monster.com/about/a/Monster-Study-Reveals-Veteran-Friendly-Employer-Brand-Key-to-Attractin5292014-D3126688
Unfortunately, he probably ran in to a few bad apples and it gave him the perception that ALL veterans are like the ones he saw.
One survey found: “Nearly all (99%) of the surveyed employers agree – veterans perform as well or better than their civilian coworkers. Similarly, employers report that veterans perform as well or better than non-veterans in terms of career advancement,” http://www.monster.com/about/a/Monster-Study-Reveals-Veteran-Friendly-Employer-Brand-Key-to-Attractin5292014-D3126688
Unfortunately, he probably ran in to a few bad apples and it gave him the perception that ALL veterans are like the ones he saw.
Monster Study Reveals Veteran Friendly Employer Brand Key to Attracting Veteran Talent |...
Monster released the sixth edition of the Veterans Talent Index (VTI) today providing insight into what veterans look for from employers what types of retention programs are being used and what concerns employers have when hiring veterans.
(2)
(0)
I wouldn't say this is a veteran issue, more so a generation that feels entitled. Encouraged by the narcissistic world of social media you get people more interested in snap chatting selfies, updating their status and hash tagging every thing under the sun. You wont find them learning how to fix a lawn mower, change a tire, or do anything else remotely close to being in the real world as there's an app for that now. #slackergeneration #dumbhelicopterkids #wimps
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200411/nation-wimps
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200411/nation-wimps
(1)
(0)
Think there might be a little PTSD involved?
And yes ... IMHO Veterans ARE an entitled class.
If you don't like, go down range for a while.
And yes ... IMHO Veterans ARE an entitled class.
If you don't like, go down range for a while.
(1)
(0)
I have seen a little bit of both instances. There are alot of great veterans out there that do a great job and are really professional. I believe it has alot to do with the company that hires them. One company I know of just hires veterans just to check the box so to speak. No expections upfront, no guidance, etc... Other companies that are successful with the veteran hires bring these people on with high expectations and hold them to it. I believe that makes a world of difference. Give a soldier a task, they will make sure it's done!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


