Posted on Sep 4, 2014
1SG Program Analyst
147K
1.9K
863
222
220
2
At what rank should soldiers be exempt from organized pt
Posted in these groups: Logo no word s FitnessImgres Physical Training
Avatar feed
Responses: 599
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
11
11
0
NEVER

If I as a leader am going to require organized PT, I will go out and sweat just like everyone else.
I expect my commander to be there as well.
(11)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Sam R. Baker
11
11
0
To me we ALL should participate in organized PT, HOWEVER that being said, I firmly and adamantly disagree with 5 days a week MANDATORY PT. Lets go for MWF and give Tu/Th back to the individual. I also firmly agree that reduced PT is an option for 290 and above, not 270, which means I go each day like everyone else cause the days of my 290 and above are gone.

Oh and for those who think I have to only be present and breathing to pass the APFT, think again!

P.S. Leadership is not only enforcing an example/standard, but setting it by leading from the front.
(11)
Comment
(0)
Maj Chris Clark
Maj Chris Clark
6 y
PT after a long field day night was always motivating, at least for me.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
10
10
0
You wear the Uniform you should maintain a degree of Physical Fitness. Just makes sense. You can't PT you should probably retire.
(10)
Comment
(0)
Maj Chris Clark
Maj Chris Clark
6 y
I had a 3 Star general who ran organized PT when he was II MEF/MARFORLANT Commander and had his staff run all the time. He would walk the passageways and God help you if you were not in PT uniform. I saw him call out Colonels and MGySgts who didn’t think they needed to be there; told them they should probably retire and most did. Ran a perfect 300 PFT until the day he retired. He also took the same seat in 20 and 25 mile hikes.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Col Squadron Commander
10
10
0
Most Air Force medical units don't have organized PT due to the 24 hour ops tempo. As a result, we are individually responsible for our own PT and for passing our PT test accordingly. I think there should be some level of individual accountability and integrity regarding fitness. However, I also believe that group PT is great for motivation, teamwork, morale, and cohesion.
(10)
Comment
(0)
SSG Pete Fleming
SSG Pete Fleming
>1 y
Well said!
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Automated Logistics Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
My father is retired Air Force. The Air Force uses common sense and do not force themselves to do foolish things because of "traditions". That is one thing I always admired. My father (Senior Master Sargent) said that if they failed there pt test 2 times they loose a rank. Pt should be all individual in my opinion. We are men and women, not kids
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I agree. Blaming the NCO becaue a Soldir cant pass a PT test is hilarious. I cant control effort and determination.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Maj Chris Clark
Maj Chris Clark
6 y
If the soldier reports to the Sgt. then his or her failing should not be a surprise and he absolutely should be able to speak to the SNCO or officer in charge exactly what he has been doing to train, motivate and work the individual soldier to get them able to pass. If he has done nothing, then he’ll yes, he should be held responsible.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
9
9
0
So who scores Gen. Odierno's and SMA Chandler's PT test? Do they also get the "One...Two...Three...Four...Four....Four....Four..."?
(9)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Aaron Kletzing
9
9
0
I don't think service members should ever be exempted from PT due to pay grade/rank. If so, then why stop at PT? ...why not ask at what pay grade leader should no longer have to qualify with their primary weapon twice per year (or whatever the unit policy is)? ...or, at what pay grade should leaders no longer have to participate in 10-mile unit 'espirit de corps' run?

I know this isn't what you asked, and I'm not putting words in your mouth at all (and I don't assume you support leaders being exempted) -- but to me, these other questions are not that far off. It becomes a slippery slope.

I know I wouldn't want to go on patrol with a leader who had not qualified with his/her weapon within the unit time standard, and I sure as heck wouldn't want the unit's more junior personnel to think that leaders operate by a different set of standards.
(9)
Comment
(0)
COL Strategic Plans Chief
COL (Join to see)
>1 y
Absolutely, sir. I belong to a Company Commander. We all do. We are all on a AAA162. I'm not hip with the Pentagon, but I've been on JTF and Corps level staffs. We all belonged to a Company Commander...even the CG. I don't always fall in with Headquarters Troop though. Sometimes you will find me with a Platoon, sometimes with a section from HHT. Sometimes, I do run on my own though. Every week I run from gym to gym to ensure that none of my Troopers are in there because the gym is off limits from 0630-0800 unless you are on profile PT with an NCO (we have it broken down into red-upper, red-lower, etc). There is no fixed unit I show up to in morning formation though. Once you get past Company level as a leader, your responsibility is to 1) ensure that your units are conducting the proper physical training and 2) stay in shape...no one wants a fat officer commanding them.
(4)
Reply
(0)
COL Strategic Plans Chief
COL (Join to see)
>1 y
and more often than not, the CG isn't working out with a formation...he's running and observing PT throughout the area. Same thing with the Corps and Division CSM. Sometimes they are in a formation, but usually, they try to get out and enforce policy while getting their PT on.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SFC Special Security Representative
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
NO rank.... Army of ONE... wait whats the slogan now? well it was Army of one... 
(3)
Reply
(0)
Maj Chris Clark
Maj Chris Clark
6 y
I ran organized PT with our BSSG commander (full Colonel) who started his Marine Corps career in Korea carrying a BAR. He had 40+ years in the Corps at the time.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Kristin Wiley
8
8
0
If organized PT acheived the results it is intended to, I would fully support that everyone should be required to particpate. However, we all know that it does not build the comradarie or acheive physical fitness results that the military needs. For this reason, I support any soldier who has the self-discipline and motivation to conduct their own personal workout plan as long as it acheives results. For those who are not capable of this feat, organized PT still has its place.

From my standpoint, PT does little to nothing to increase my physical fitness capabilities, and can be a miserable waste of time (additional 20 minute drive to PT vs. the Office). I have a permanent profile for sleep issues, deployment-related illnesses, etc, so my argument is that extra twenty minute drive twice a week significantly affects my sleep, and I am more capable of finding exercises that provide the most benefit within the limits of my profile in a gym with a personal training plan. This also allows me the flexibility to cut my workouts short if my asthma, or other conditions act up. A normal unit PT day for me is walking two miles; such a workout! (sarcasm) Unfortunately, the task of imposing indidivual based exemptions is not worth the effort. Time is better spent developing a more effective unit PT progam.
(8)
Comment
(0)
SGT Kristin Wiley
SGT Kristin Wiley
11 y
Sir,
First off, you make a poor assumption thinking that you know me or my experiences. Last I checked FM 7-22 applied to the whole Army, and there is not a different regulation for combat-arms. I am also appalled that you mention my limitations in such a disrespecting manner.

Since you failed to read my entire original post let me restate that a 2 mile walk is not considered a workout whether or not a person is on profile. For those with leg injuries, it either lets them stretch out their injury or causes further damage. Due to short-sighted training plans, this is all injured and ill soldiers are tasked to do. A personal training plan for each soldier based on their individual limitations would provide significantly more benefits to physical fitness without causing further injury.

The PT experience you described I have no problems with IF IT WORKS! I have no problem with organized PT in itself; however PRT as described in FM 7-22 is not effective in maintaining a combat ready force. If you read the FM, you'll notice the longest recommended duration for running is 30 minutes (table 10-2). It even says that the running duration should be determined by time, not distance. So unless your whole company is conducting 4-mile runs in 30 minutes or less, technically your example would not be in accordance with FM 7-22.

If you have ever worked competitively in fitness, you'll know that what works for one individual does not work for everyone. Proper diet, technique, and exercising without overtraining are all required to maintain high levels of physical fitness. The current catch-all version of organized PT is not effective for the whole military force in maintaining physical fitness levels.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SFC Intelligence Analyst
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
You've really hit the nail on the head SGT Kristin Wiley, particularly in your last paragraph. I've never gained much from long runs, but 3 mile fartlek runs once a week and sprints twice a week have shaved minutes off of my run time.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SSG Terminal Operations Nco
SSG (Join to see)
11 y
I usually wound up with less sleep (where good sleep did not exist when deployed and after), shin splints, a sore hip (and old injury from command PT when I was a boot E-3) and sore knees (already bad from years of DoD service) from most command PT. Or I was bored. Funny thing was that we usually ran organized by BN, so I never got to meet any of the other soldiers from the other BNs, BDEs,et al, and I really didn't need to bond with my BN who I already worked with every day anyway. And I shared an open bay living space with everyone below E-7 in my BN anyway, so we were pretty sick of each other for the most part before long. On my last deployment, my BN was scattered across theatre(s) and worked on a different base and lived in different (and much worse) barracks on the far side of base from our BDE on up anyway, so we never really saw them....
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Eric Blue
SSG Eric Blue
6 y
SGT Kristin Wiley - I agree with the last paragraph. I do work competitively in group fitness and what's good for this person may not necessarily be good for their neighbor...which is why I offer different versions of whatever workout I'm leading. I also understand the factors that most people don't get, such as mental strength & flexibility, diet, physical stamina and/or limitations, and the magic variable.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Recruiter
8
8
0
I truly hope this isn't a serious question. Um, never, I understand some positions dictate that you have responsibilities that may prevent you from being at organized pt on a regular basis, however this has nothing to do with rank. The more rank you have the more visible your pt sessions should be in order to, I don't know, SET THE EXAMPLE......end rant.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Burns
8
8
0
Most of my PT is disorganized so Im not sure.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Maintenance Supervisor
7
7
0
Everyone should be doing PT regardless of rank..
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close