Posted on Dec 2, 2016
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM
27
27
0
A0b052df
Posted in these groups: 4276e14c UniformsCcredberet Beret
Avatar feed
Responses: 33
SSG Tom Pike
25
25
0
Edited >1 y ago
Way back in my day a Beret meant something special. Green was SF, Maroon was Paratroop, and Black was Ranger.

Now everybody gets a trophy and a silly hat to wear. Rangers have their Tan, it is distinctive and separates them from the regular soldiers. I see no reason to go back to them wearing the black beret. It is like the black beret has now been soiled.

And I think there are much more important things to worry about then the color of hats.
(25)
Comment
(0)
SFC (Other / Not listed)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SMSgt Thor Merich - I don't think it has ruined it so much as the tan beret and its symbolism is more reflective of the latest evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment. Most of the Rangers who have served in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have only worn the tan beret, and have no association with the black beret.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Will Phillips
SSG Will Phillips
>1 y
I was in SSG Pikes era and only elite units wore berets. I was there to suffer the indignity of having my maroon beret taken away for a few years. It was a kick in the nuts for us as far as unit moral went. The crappy ball caps that were issued at the time were just plain awful. The guys in SF were great advocates in restoring the maroon berets for us. I respect the tan ranger beret to be sure, but the black beret for them in my opinion should never have been taken away.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
>1 y
SSG Will Phillips - I agree, only elite units should wear the berets, they worked hard for their status and having that distinction is something that never should have been passed around to everyone.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW5 Ranger Dave
CW5 Ranger Dave
>1 y
868d2bfb
I was in the 509th when we got our Berets. Prior to that we wore C Caps in Greens or Khakis with a Silver Dollar backed glider patch. In Fatigues, we wore ball caps. After this assignment I wore the Black Beret while serving as an RI at Camp Darby.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Richard StCyr
23
23
0
I hope the focus is on anything but the friggin' beret colors! Personally I'd like to see focus on IED defeat since we are still loosing troops to them.
(23)
Comment
(0)
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM
>1 y
TRUMP said best last night the focus is going to be in our country and our military isn't going anywhere so where do you think our troops are going to be used? There's a lot crap going on in the United states that Law enforcement can't control so why not. I think the people who are being paid to riot and protest against our new Pres. Elect Mr. Trump/ Flag Burning should be dealt with in other ways and that will show the other that we are not messing around and your IED people will stop as well because the military will find them as well.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CSM Richard StCyr
CSM Richard StCyr
>1 y
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM - No, yes and yes and no on the points.
You can't crush anyone without ground troops to fix and hold them in place, someone has to verify that the target is a target and not some load of yokels fleeing the scene, dead civilians is a bad graphic and bad business. I think history supports my view.
We lost troops just last week to IEDs in Iraq and a couple the week or so before in Afghanistan, and the things are cheap and easy to make, so I would expect that any enemy we face foreign or domestic would adapt to using them. I personally prefer being shot at, to being thumped. But that is just my opinion. Trucks are cheap, Soldiers are priceless.
While I think the distinctive headgear for Rangers and Airborne Soldiers are important for group identity and historic items, we now have several iterations of Soldiers who have grown up and served combat tours wearing the new Ranger Beret and I would think that is the one they identify with, so us old buzzards reviving an old fight that was lost may be pissing on the young guys legs. Again that's just my opinion, I didn't like the beret or the garrison cap. I would have been happier with a toque than either of those.
In any case I hope they spend the time and money getting the Troops whatever they need to fight, survive and win.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SSG Will Phillips
SSG Will Phillips
>1 y
CSM StCry, With respect, I do not think anyone would disagree with your statement about defeating IED's. But IED's have been in existence since gun powder was created. And to me since 9/11 we have seen our Humvee's up-armored and newer IED resistance vehicles come on line. (I went to war in 1983 in a Recon platoon with a 1965 jeep, you go to war with what you have.) This tells me that the pentagon has been trying to minimize the effects on IED's on our troops. I understand your passion about this as you have an engineering background, and by God you had the balls to go to Jump School.
I believe the story is more about tradition and unit morale than anything else.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Michael Kucik
19
19
0
The black beret isn't ours anymore and in my opinion is no longer what we want after it has been handed around. We have the tan beret, it is ours and we will keep it.
(19)
Comment
(0)
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM
>1 y
but look at history of the RANGER, I'm not RANGER but do you know military history and what it stands for just because some 4 star Gen took it way don't mean you have the right or you earned to wear it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
>1 y
SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM - I am not a Ranger either, however, I do know the history of the use of the black beret in the US Army. Actually at the time that the 1st Ranger Battalion was being stood up, the black beret was also being used by the Armor community; and just like several other US formations, this tradition goes back to WWII and the British. As far as the statements by GEN Shenseki and SMA Tilley (they quote 1918 and 1924 and French influence) would have you believe, the use of beret type headgear in the armed forces of the various nations that make up the United Kingdom has been around for even longer. As an example the use can be dated back to the 16th century (for those of you that are a bit date challenged, that would be the 1500's).
(2)
Reply
(0)
CSM Charles Hayden
CSM Charles Hayden
>1 y
What verse of "The Airborne Song" is that attitude from?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Do you think the Rangers will get back their black berets with the new changes in our new government?
LTC Stephen C.
6
6
0
I can't imagine they'd even want it back now, SFC William Stephens A. Jr., 3 MSM, JSCM. I think that everyone now identifies the tan beret with Rangers.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MGySgt James Forward
6
6
0
Not that I have a dog in this fight, but to me it's a silly cover that serves absolutely no military function. Not poking you Army guys but it is what it is...Semper Fi.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SSG Wally Lawver
SSG Wally Lawver
>1 y
MSgt George Cater - I have also been told by a WW2 era guy its called a "Piss cover= your head looks like a penis when its on your head" ..........
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt George Cater
MSgt George Cater
>1 y
SSG Wally Lawver - Thanks.
Not that I'm a Corpsman (pecker checker) but I've never seen or heard of one that pointy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
When the Army had those garrison caps as part of their dress green uniform we called it something a little more inappropriate...
(3)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Michael Caldwell
Sgt Michael Caldwell
>1 y
I don't understand all the Beret stuff anyway. In the Corps we all wore the same uniforms, headgear, footwear and we knew who was who, Recon from Grunt, Airborn for non-guals.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Jean (John) F. B.
5
5
0
I did not support berets for everyone back then, and still don't. Having said that, if the Army does away with the black beret for non-Ranger, SF and Airborne, they should keep the ones they currently wear (tan, maroon and green).
(5)
Comment
(0)
COL Jean (John) F. B.
COL Jean (John) F. B.
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) - You are entitled to your opinion. My comments are about those who refuse to follow orders and regulations. "Theft of property forging of documents, and a whole host of uprofessional acts", as you mentioned, have no place in a disciplined, professional military. While I know some of that goes on, most of the stories about such are embellished. I respect professional soldiers... Those who refuse to follow orders and regulations, break the law, etc. ... not so much.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC (Other / Not listed)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
COL Jean (John) F. B. - Careful, it is easy to fall off your moral high ground if you spend too much time looking down your nose at these guys who did more for their country than officers such as yourself. Those men I respect, guys such as yourself, not so much. So Merry Christmas and have a Happy New Year, I hope your narrow view of ethics, tradition and honor keep you warm on these cold winter nights.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Jean (John) F. B.
COL Jean (John) F. B.
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) - First, I respect all our service members and realize what they do, and have done, for our country. You have no idea what I have done for our country, nor do I know that about you, so disparaging each other is useless. What I do know is that there is no place in our military for those who refuse to obey orders or follow regulations. There is simply no valid justification for it. Those who flaunt the rules and violate the law bring discredit to the professional military. You call it bravado... I call it unprofessional and indisciplined.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you, as well. And, yes, I sleep very well at night, thank you.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPL Robert Christoffersen
CPL Robert Christoffersen
>1 y
I remember the LT> that dropped out of Ranger School tell the SGT. that some day he will get the beret and the Rangers would have to get an other color , that so calle dGen. did that with George Jr. as pres.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Program Control Manager
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
The black beret was originally headgear for tankers. It was black to hide grease spots, and it didn't interfere with the using a headset or looking through telescopic sights. Rangers were not authorized to wear black berets until 1975, and by that time they were already authorized for Tankers.

So if it's going to revert back to someone... it should revert back to Armor.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Just color code the Army's branches like 1st Cav did in the 70s.

In the aftermath of Vietnam, the 1st Cavalry Division was converted from the air-mobile light infantry role into a triple capabilities (TRICAP) division. The unit received an infusion of mechanized infantry and artillery, to make it capable of missions needing three types of troops; armored, air-mobility, and air cavalry.

In the post-Vietnam era, morale in the US Army waned. In response, from 1973 through 1979 HQDA permitted local commanders to encourage morale-enhancing uniform distinctions. Consequently, many units embraced various colored berets, for example armor and armored cavalry units often adopted the black beret. Similarly many other units including the First Cavalry Division embraced various colored berets in an attempt to improve dwindling morale. The First Cav decided to assign various colored berets to the three major TRICAP and division support units. In this implementation, armored cavalry, airmobile infantry units, air cavalry units, division artillery units, and division support units all wore different colored berets, including black, light blue, kelly green, and red.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Dan Castaneda
2
2
0
They don't want it back. Its been tarnished.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Erich Guenther
2
2
0
I think a cheaper solution would be to add a plastic propeller on the top of the black beret that spins when the wind hits it (lol). Just kidding but I think we have had enough taxpayer funded uniform changes the last 15 years or so. What are we on the third or forth Army camo uniform now? Third attempt at Army boots for Asia? I watched the uniform changes as folks went through DFW Airport and could not believe some of them (like the Navy and their Blue Camo...WTH?).
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
1
1
0
I agree with the following:
1.) There are bigger fish (threats) to fry (defeat)
2.) The beret swap is a done deal
3.) Who wants something/someone back that/who has been used by everyone?
4.) Tradition is one thing, but the beret really sucks

I am in the 82nd right now, so we have to wear the maroon beret all the time. I hate wearing any beret, as the patrol cap is a lot easier to put on, is more comfortable to wear, and is functional (keeps the sun out of your eyes better than a beret)
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close