Posted on Feb 17, 2020
During the draft period, what happened to conscripted members who could not make it past the initial training?
13.6K
130
35
65
65
0
In an all-volunteer military, there are a certain amount of recruits who just do not make it through basic or the job-specific (AFSC, MOS, whatever the Navy and USMC calls it) training. They are discharged for failure to adapt or to meet standards.
What would have happened to these conscripted members who were unable to meet the minimal standards? Were they just pushed through the system after the training was "presented" to them without having to prove they could actually do the job? Would they have been honorably discharged?
What would have happened to these conscripted members who were unable to meet the minimal standards? Were they just pushed through the system after the training was "presented" to them without having to prove they could actually do the job? Would they have been honorably discharged?
Selective Service (the Draft)
Failure
Training
Discharge
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 14
15
15
0
First thing is that the classification system was designed to weed out those that couldn't perform because of obvious physical or mental conditions, the designation 4F was for those deemed unfit. If you actually made it to the painted feet, the standards were completely different. From my observation of the remains of the Draft Army when I came in and anecdotally from those that served during the period, there just weren't many standards for the draftees. Couldn't pass PT? You will get in shape in Vietnam. Overweight? Not a problem. A marine friend that is a bit older than I am that served in Marine Infantry claimed that half of his platoon wouldn't have passed the IQ test required today (1966/67 time frame). While I am of the opinion that we put out people that with a bit of motivation would be acceptable soldiers today, the reason for the standards we have today was the Cluster**** that the Vietnam Draft made of the services.
(15)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
SPC Richard Zacke - He would not be getting Majors pay while a SSG in the regular Army, but if he had ten years as an Officer, he would retire at his highest rank and pay level.
(1)
(0)
SPC Richard Zacke
CPT Lawrence Cable Just going by what SSG Hutenstein told us. We were young pups he took under his wing. But thanks for the info.
(0)
(0)
SFC Ronald Miller
Funny thing to say as I was given that choice as the judge was tired of seeing me in traffic court? I tried the Marines first but they had a wait list? Then the Navy but they had a longer wait list? The Air Force was next but they had the longest wait list?? So Across the street was the ARMY recruiter and two weeks later on 14 Sept. 1967 I began my Military Service. 4yrs. active and 22 yrs. Reserves & National Guard. I took a 15.5 yr. break from 1981-1996 Then rejoined the Guard and finished with the Army Reserve in 2007. SFC. Miller Ret. ( Also ... I managed to fit in 26 yrs. of Law Enforcement. )
(0)
(0)
9
9
0
I served 1965/68 enlisted but with many drafted men during that period,everyone made it through training ,if not the Army had recycling programs which had a small number of personnel fail,these men were returned to civilian life with a general discharge I think,also had experiences with Pres.Johnson’s 100,000 program in Vietnam ,replacements for Infantry units,piss poor decision by the bean counters in my estimation.
(9)
(0)
CW3 Richard Doty
I have no idea if Johnson was involved in that decision, but I believe that SECDEF McNamara owns that one. McNamara was known for making "corporate decisions" that didn't necessarily work in the military. According to one article, "The program brought over 300,000 men to Vietnam who failed to meet minimum criteria for military service, both physically and mentally." Apparently over 320,000 men who could not pass the AFQT were brought in. Yikes!
(1)
(0)
SGT Philip Roncari
CW3 Richard Doty
Oh you mean McNamara,the head bean counter that stuck us with the M16 A1 ,piece of crap ,that ,and I can personally attest was a failed weapon system from the git go,he of course was not alone ,that tragic and sometime lethal decision Military and bureaucratic were all too happy to field,unfortunately we poor slobs early in the war paid the price,as for the 100,000 program ,our unit did receive replacements that were pushed through training and really should NOT have been in Infantry line companies,they paid the price in KIAs and WIAs,I was ashamed by our government’s practices to this day,Phil.
Oh you mean McNamara,the head bean counter that stuck us with the M16 A1 ,piece of crap ,that ,and I can personally attest was a failed weapon system from the git go,he of course was not alone ,that tragic and sometime lethal decision Military and bureaucratic were all too happy to field,unfortunately we poor slobs early in the war paid the price,as for the 100,000 program ,our unit did receive replacements that were pushed through training and really should NOT have been in Infantry line companies,they paid the price in KIAs and WIAs,I was ashamed by our government’s practices to this day,Phil.
(0)
(0)
SFC Ronald Miller
1968 ... Great Time in AMERICA every cycle in A. I. T. was being sent to NAM for TET our MP unit was placed on hold for a 5 day period and 60 of us were sent to KOREA day after the Pueblo was captured by North Korea??? Yes Sir! Great times!!
SFC MILLER RET.
SFC MILLER RET.
(1)
(0)
SGT Philip Roncari
SFC Ronald Miller
1968…I was at Ft.Polk, AIT Committee group instructor for 11b /11c ,had just returned from Vietnam ,just about every one of the trainees were headed to that hell hole,certainly wasn’t a great time for them,Phil.
1968…I was at Ft.Polk, AIT Committee group instructor for 11b /11c ,had just returned from Vietnam ,just about every one of the trainees were headed to that hell hole,certainly wasn’t a great time for them,Phil.
(0)
(0)
I served from 1968 to 1972. If a recruit was fat they were sent to the fat farm and there was a platoon for attitude reajustment. If they could not hack it, they did not graduate Boot Camp and were discharged.
(7)
(0)
SGT Carl Blas
Same for me 72 to 75 at Bragg, the motivation platoon was called CCF (conduct correction facility) some that went there said, it worked for them to adjust their attitude. If CCF didn't work, they went to the brigg for who knows for how long, or what happened to you.
The Fat Farm did PT all day, and meals were adjusted to loose weight, if that didn't work, you were out. The guys did always try to help the Fat guys, giving them advise and taking them out to excersize more, to motivate them.
We always put the fat guys out front of the daily 2 or 5 mile run, to help them move and to keep running. Some fell out, Well, see you later.
The Fat Farm did PT all day, and meals were adjusted to loose weight, if that didn't work, you were out. The guys did always try to help the Fat guys, giving them advise and taking them out to excersize more, to motivate them.
We always put the fat guys out front of the daily 2 or 5 mile run, to help them move and to keep running. Some fell out, Well, see you later.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
-
Ask questionGet expert advice and
tips for your questions. -
Post updatePost pictures, personal updates, plans, or anything you like!
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google 
