Posted on Feb 9, 2015
TSgt Joshua Copeland
28.4K
317
212
11
11
0
Pbj
As seen on FaceBook:

"If my kid can't bring peanut butter to school, you cant bring your unvaccinated kid to school."

Aaaaand go!

Really look forward to MAJ (Join to see)'s thoughts based on his background.
Posted in these groups: Books Schools
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 45
SGT Steven Eugene Kuhn MBA
10
10
0
Edited >1 y ago
Mik 6238
I find the language used here like "idiots", "Arrogant", "Ignorant" and so on, hard to stomach.

Let me fill you in why: My Niece got the MMR and suddenly developed mild autism, my business partners Sister (who is a Nurse) had her son get the MMR and he is now full on Autistic.

My son in 8 months old and his MMR is due in 4 months and I am thinking like this: If I say yes and he is autistic afterwards, how can I ever live with myself? Seriously, with the emotional issues we already have as veterans, would this put me over the top?

I live in Hungary, the one country in the world with the most mandatory vaccines and funnily enough, the lowest rate of childhood sicknesses in Europe...so this gives me hope but I still am nervous, scared and downright terrified.

I find a constructive, informative conversation useful, my wife and I are really struggling. It helps none when someone quotes the Government as the source and calls someone stupid, ignorant or arrogant who does not heed the order...if this was the case then why the fight for the 2nd Amendment when Obama says he wants to repeal it, he is the Government and he orders it, you must do it according to most of those who posted here.

We cannot pick and choose what fits our belief and then use the very entity, which we despise for trying to change the 2nd Amendment, to validate our arguments, becasue then they are neither a part of a conversation or an argument, it is simply a demeaning statement.

I ask that anyone who respond please keep my beautiful son in mind, this is all I care about, no need to insult me or my thought process, it will get you nowhere.

Thank you,
Steven (and Max)

SSG (Join to see) , TSgt Joshua Copeland , Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS ,
PO2 Steven Erickson
(10)
Comment
(0)
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
The act that there is a vaccine injury reporting system has nothing to do with autism. The last 2 cases i read about that supposedly came out to "our vaccines caused your childs autism" was more accurately put out as "your child had an adverse reaction and developed seizures and a learning disability".
I also have 3 children. All have been diagnosed with autism. Not one is like the other with symptoms.
As far as throwing out terms like igorance and the like: i believe some of us are sensative to the issue.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
There is no "proven direct link"
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Steven Eugene Kuhn MBA
SGT Steven Eugene Kuhn MBA
>1 y
I beg to differ SFC (Join to see) - simply "believing" the Government is not always the best decision. I find it amazing how so many citizens take the word of the Gov. on this issue but when it comes to changing Gun Rights, we go into a rage...priorities?

http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/u-s-media-blackout-italian-courts-rule-vaccines-cause-autism/
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I do not profess to blindly believe anything. Its simple logic. To say outright that something causes a condition you would be able to accurately predict when and where the condition arises. Not to discredit italy's ruling but it doesnt mean we as a nation are obligated to go along with it without our own ruling. I also dont believe a condition such as the one we are discussing can possibly come from one singular cause.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Command Sergeant Major IN
7
7
0
Getting sick is one thing, but some people are dying because parents didn't want to vaccinate their children, for whatever reason.

A child with a suppressed immune system due to cancer or some other illness/condition cannot take the vaccine. Along comes a child whose parent didn't "want" to give their child the vaccine and now has measles/mumps/whatever, and causes the child who couldn't take the vaccine to get sick, and in some cases, die.

If my child couldn't take a vaccine and got sick and died because another parent didn't "want" to vaccinate their child, I'd be going to prison.
(7)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
I'm in.
(2)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Joshua Copeland
TSgt Joshua Copeland
>1 y
I prefer spades, but poker works.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Charles Griffith
SPC Charles Griffith
>1 y
As a parent with 2 daughters with low IGG counts who are unable to get the MMR I am in fact living the nightmare. But thanks to my ability to think clearly and plan properly I think we are going to be fine. I would suggest anyone who has a kid who is unable to be vaxed contact the school and start a 504 contract. The School can inform you as to what will be needed from the Dr. but in the contract make sure you stipulate that you are to be informed if there is ANY communicable Disease discovered in your students School as soon as reasonably possible. I also have stipulated that all of my girls teachers allow for mine to ask to be moved if they notice signs of illness in students around them. This step took action on my part to talk with my daughters about their condition and how to recognize these signs and that THEY are responsible for their safety on the matter. I only had to eat one teacher so far. Hope this helps.
(5)
Reply
(0)
CSM Command Sergeant Major IN
CSM (Join to see)
>1 y
That is awesome information to share SPC Charles Griffith . Thanks!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
6
6
0
I just read the below article earlier this morning and thought it would be something good to share here regarding this thread's subject.

With that said, I agree with SPC McNeil's premise of responsibility, which I have mentioned many many times throughout dozens of other threads. Leaving the responsibility of our own lives on others is totally ridiculous. At the same time we must be respectful (I didn't say "like") of other's decisions or concerns. For example, if one has an allergy to peanuts then not only say something (civilly) but understand you have absolutely NO right in demanding others not be able to eat peanuts. On the other side, if someone states they have an allergy to peanuts then take caution if you wish to eat something with peanuts while around the person and also you have NO right to be callous with the lives of others. Yes, part of the problem is when this occurs in a school and children don't have the maturity (obviously) to NOT alienate or make fun of others. The key here is the adults being willing to LEARN, be respectful and to properly teach their children. It truly is that simple.

https://gma.yahoo.com/dads-heartfelt-plea-congress-2-old-leukemia-exposed-210618824--abc-news-health.html

SGT Steven Eugene Kuhn MBA, PO2 Steven Erickson, SSG(P) (Join to see), Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS, TSgt Joshua Copeland, SSG Justin McCoy, PO2 William Allen Crowder, Cpl Jeff N., SFC John Gates, 1LT Sandy Annala, SFC (Join to see), SPC Charles Griffith, SrA Marc Haynes, MAJ Carl Ballinger, CSM (Join to see), SGT Jim Z., CW5 (Join to see), SSgt Alexander Ingram, MAJ Matthew Arnold, SPC James Mcneil, CPT Jack Durish, SGT Kristin Wiley, SGT Richard H., Cpl (Join to see).
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Charles Griffith
SPC Charles Griffith
>1 y
I am all for the PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY movement in this country. We as a country have allowed for the displacement of responsibility for far to long and we are seeing the result. Not only individually as in of personal safety but systemically in our Justice system. How often do Judges met out lesser sentences due to "addiction" be it drug or alcohol? happens all the time. but WHO is responsible for putting the substance in the body of the defendant? who failed to take responsibility for them selves and seek help if needed to fix their "addiction". I just think we need to bring back personal responsibility and accept responsibility for OUR OWN actions and stop worrying about what Johnny down the block is doing if it does not impact our lives.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SPC Charles Griffith, interesting. I agree with the responsibility part especially since it falls in with true freedom. Both go hand in hand. Unfortunately, this modern era is rife with a victim-hood mentality that blames others for their own actions/misdeeds. It's made worse with not only the perpetual election of elitists who just crave more power but also the apathy of others who either refuse to vote or refuse to stand up for others. I will say I very slightly disagree with your very last line because we need to stand up in support of one another. Just because what Johnny does down the block may not affect us but it probably negatively affects others around him. Thoughts?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Charles Griffith
SPC Charles Griffith
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) We tread on the slippery slope here my friend. if we are to claim personal responsibility then is it not the responsibility of those who it does affect to speak up for them selves? Now if you are saying once Johnny has violated we need to stand and hold him accountable I agree but the offended needs to shed the light on the violation IMHO.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SPC Charles Griffith, oh most definitely. 100% agree with that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Food Allergies vs Anti Vaxxers?
SGT Rik Thibodeau
6
6
0
Vaccine
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Charles Griffith
SPC Charles Griffith
>1 y
Everyone out of the gene pool this one has infected it ! ! ! !
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Purchasing Manager
PO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
That one got a laugh out of me for real!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Danny Eldridge
SPC Danny Eldridge
>1 y
I'm laughing out loud, and my cubicle neighbors aren't amused :-)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ(P) Operations Research/Systems Analysis
5
5
0
People tend to forget that science has already disproven the myth of the connection between vaccinations and the handful of blamed disorders. This is a done deal. There is little to no sciences backing up the claims. However, there is science that has disproven the claim. What more can be projected at this point?

Those that quote the TTPs of the good ‘ol days might not realize that times are much different today than they were 20-30 years ago. Diseases, bacteria, and infections have greatly increased in strength. Drinking out of a water hose today is much more potentially lethal than it was in the 1980s.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Machinist's Mate
4
4
0
Let me see if I'm understanding this correctly... We vaccinate our children to protect them from diseases and then worry about the diseases that a non-vaccinated child might expose them to? If we're so confident in the ability of these vaccines to protect our children, why would we worry about what someone else does with their child? Are these diseases going to somehow mutate in a non-vaccinated child to become super deadly to the vaccinated child? What am I missing?
(4)
Comment
(0)
LTC Student
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
PO3 Mike Glade,
I believe that Capt Jason Williams is correct, in the fact that if something is so far out in left field that it isn't even in the same state, let alone the same stadium, it does not deserve respect. It is just wrong. We as a society have gotten away from telling people that they are wrong, everyone's beliefs on any subject are now right. I believe that a big part of this is due to the fact that every kid growing up that is now under age 30-35 (yes I am in that age group) got a trophy for just being a part of the team their entire life. It is stupid. After age 8 or so, it should be about rewarding those that are good at something and showing others that you may want to do something else.
To bring all back around, because I have been rambling, this is the reason that I believe that Capt Williams is right in telling you "I don't have to respect their beliefs..."
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT Williams, your arrogance and inflammatory language is unbecoming.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Instructor Navigator
Lt Col (Join to see)
>1 y
Noted again. I must say, I'm surprised this is the issue that's provoked so many down votes. I would have expected my stance on religion to be more provocative than the stance that we should be vaccinating people, especially to a group who have had many, many mandatory vaccinations.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Matthew Arnold
MAJ Matthew Arnold
>1 y
Ah, why didn't I think of that? Oh, because it's a research based informed response. Are we suppose to be doing that? Seriously, you're right, if my kid is vaccinated, what am I worried about.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC James Mcneil
4
4
0
The pro-vaccine vs. anti-vaccine debate is something I've largely steered clear of, and recently I waded into the waters of this debate. I found that people on both sides tend to be very rude and very arrogant. I've found that there are unsupported and completely unscientific arguments on both sides, and neither side has changed my mind.

I am personally pro-vaccine. But I am not going to tell a parent that's anti-vaccine that they have to do so because I believe in it.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SPC James Mcneil
SPC James Mcneil
>1 y
While I understand what you're saying, I still see a problem here. When I was a kid, I never had any trouble understanding the concept of "eat your own lunch" and "don't eat what you didn't take to school."
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Student
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
I was not advocating that my son was going to eat someone else's lunch. If he gets near peanut dust he starts to break out in hives, if he eats something that has peanuts in it even as the last ingredient he has serious issues, if he eats at the same table where someone else has eaten something with peanut butter he can have serious issues. He already knows before he is 3 to not eat things that we as his parents don't provide for him. What is so wrong with society today that says that your children, or your grandchildren's wants, override my child's needs.
You SPC Mcniel and others with the same opinion are what is driving parents who care for their children and the safety of other's children into school districts where people care about our children's safety.
You can keep you outdated yesteryear opinion, I'm just fine with mine.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC James Mcneil
SPC James Mcneil
>1 y
In that case your son is the first person with a peanut allergy that I've heard of that wasn't purely ingestion. So, here's where I have a question. Do his teachers know? I'm sure by now they do. As do his classmates. As do the administrators, etc.
That fact (assuming I'm correct) is yet another nail in the coffin of the premise of the image in the OP. Why? Because the parents of a child that is allergic would be ideally taking steps to make sure people know. The idea of a child not being able to take a food to work because people "might be" allergic is flawed on every level. In that case (and it is a rare case) with the teachers, classmates, parents of classmates, etc. knowing that there is an allergy, it would be the responsible thing for them to make the decision not to do so.
I'm all about advocating responsibility. I am not in favor of forcing it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Purchasing Manager
PO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
I would think he would be treated the same as any other special needs child. That is to say they should make accommodations for him to eat where he cannot be exposed to the allergens. Banning a common lunch item from the entire school to "protect" one or even a handful of kids is just asinine.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Desk Officer
4
4
0
I'd say that's a solid argument, TSgt Joshua Copeland. Of course the anti-vaccination crowd will disagree. I think they're wrong though.
(4)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Joshua Copeland
TSgt Joshua Copeland
>1 y
CW5 (Join to see), I am sure they would, and just maybe a group of folks that just show up at the hospital and get injected with whatever the medic sticks in our arms are not really gonna be the folks to argue against it either, but we do have a large vet/retired segment!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Matthew Arnold
3
3
0
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one (or few). You are free to choose to not vaccinate. But, then you are not free to engage freely with the public and spread your da-zzz. If you choose not to vaccinate then keep you kids home and home school them, and home church them, and home, uh, everything.
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Student
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
While I agree with you on the vaccination premise of your argument, could this then apply in the opposite direction against kids with food allergies? Or could it be that the "need" of a food is actually a "want" and could be repressed for the need of the few?
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Matthew Arnold
MAJ Matthew Arnold
>1 y
Sorry, I'm too bizy laughing to type.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Donald Hammond
3
3
0
DISCLAIMER : My kids were vaccinated BEFORE the idiocy of it all was known.

Now then, the CDC and UN have both admitted these vaccines are pretty much worthless. Sure, they may protect the kids for a few years but now they are admitting that you are not protected for life as if you had caught these 3 naturally. So who profits? The pharmaceutical companies. You don't.

Did you see the CDC's tap dancing on why vaccinated people were getting the measles this time around? Because other people were not vaccinated. No (actual quote here) "herd immunity". That's right. If everybody else around you isn't vaccinated, you can catch it even if you were vaccinated. Wow.

I don't know about autism but they are zapping kids with more diseases at the same time then they would be exposed to normally. Also the potential side effects are enormous and long. Whereas the downside of getting them naturally is almost nothing. Most deaths that happen due to measles are caused by dehydration.

The pharm companies are pulling the wool over your eyes. Just as they have tried to do with flu shots. It is crap.

Oh, and if people are getting the measles who were vaccinated this means it mutated and now there is a strain out there that nobody is immune to again. Thanks VAXXERS! You have unleashed a disease that can not be controlled.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SPC Charles Griffith
SPC Charles Griffith
>1 y
Thank you for this as I had not even thought about that. Proof that 4 eyes are better than 2 and 2 brains are better than 1
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close