Has your opinion of Hillary evolved with the evolving scandals surrounding her?

The case for Server-gate has been building for some time CPT Jack Durish. I am hopeful that the evidence for all applicable charges is being gathered in an undramatic manner [at least for those not directly involved] and that charges will be presented by early summer for all involved.

A Strong Number 4. Cant stand her and the fact she has a total disregard for the law makes me hate her even more.

CPT Jack Durish, it's hard for me to believe that my opinion of her could worsen, but it has!

You mean all of those GOP faux scandals? Benghazi, RETROACTIVELY classified emails, Whitewater, etc.?

No, I've tuned out the 25 year conservative crusade against her long ago.

CPT Jack Durish I guess I fall between #2 and #3. I am starting to have a lot of doubt about her honestly, especially since she has always had an excuse for every incident that has arisen. I am truly in a quandary now, because I am a conservative Democrat. The person I was rooting for (Jim Webb) has dropped out my other favorite choice is Martin O'Malley, but he is so far down in the polls I don't think he will survive to many primaries to make it to the one here in Texas. I am no supporter of Trump, Cruz, or Rubio. I think the best candidate thus far is Kaish, but like O'Malley, he is so far down in the polls that I don't think he will survive. I honestly don't know who to vote for this time for the first time in my life.

The thing I don't like about Hillary Clinton is that she lies habitually, but does so badly. I most definitely believe she abused her power as SoS to get rich. God knows what she would do as President. Very unethical and lacking in integrity.

... we can wish ... we can always wish that people will change their mind when confronted with the truth.

Most definitely #4. I have despised ALL Clinton's since Bill's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" moment under oath to the Grand Jury, then two hours later admitted the relationship, and Hillary's treatment of Bill's sexual assault victims.
IMO, ANYONE who supports the Clintons in ANY manner are morally and ethically corrupt. They see themselves as above the law and standards of conduct that "we" are expected to adhere to, don't apply to them. Case in point; Brian Williams embellishes the helicopter incident in Iraq and is forced to resign as NBC news anchor, yet Hillary can make a claim that she had to dodge sniper fire in Bosnia:
“I remember landing under sniper fire,” Clinton said during a George Washington University campaign event on March 17, 2008. “There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”
When there is AMPLE video evidence that FULLY and COMPLETELY discredits her "version." Yet she is forgiven by just saying “So I made a mistake. That happens. It shows I’m human, which for some people is a revelation.”
I won't even go in to her email scandal and the OVER 1300 " Classified" emails found on her PRIVATE server, with 26 being classified TOP SECRET and ABOVE!!!

Mine hasn't changed because this article is just the latest from someone who wasn't there and is not involved in the investigation bloviating. He states it would be impossible for her to do her job without email. But funny, when former SECDEF Gates stated that he never used email, no one blinked. And President Bush said he never used email. Here's a quote from Gates:

“Yeah, that’s a concern for me,” Gates said. “I never used email when I was head of CIA or head of the Department of Defense. As I used to joke, I didn’t want to have some chief of station overseas email me and say he was going to do something if I didn’t get back to him in three hours, and I would get back from a five hour hearing to discover I was two hours too late."

So when this latest guy claims it would be impossible for Hillary to do her job without email, that undercuts his credibility immediately. My opinion hasn't changed because everything that has come out about this investigation has been leaks by people who never actually quote sources involved in the investigation and instead just repeat a bunch of "it looks bad for Hillary" opinions from those NOT involved. Just this morning on Morning Joe, Andrea Mitchell, who has been in the business for decades with well developed sources, stated that her sources, including some actually involved in the investigation, said the focus wasn't so much on the emails themselves. This is because the emails seem to have generated from public sources. But rather, they are looking at what Hillary and her aides said in response to those emails to see if they mentioned classified stuff that way.

When Joe Scarborough heard that, he started stammering and stuttering, and continually tried to cut Andrea off, because that reporting didn't support the republican talking points. But bear in mind that Andrea actually said her sources were part of the investigations. None of the republican hit pieces claim that.

As an aside, many people can't believe there could be TS stuff there accidently. But let me give you an example. If you have ever read an article on the internet about the Snowden NSA document thefts, then there is a very good chance you have TS material on your computer. The DOD has sent out memos reminding everyone that just because wikileaks has released TS/SCI documents on the internet doesn't mean that info is now unclassified. In fact, DOD emphasized that it remains TS/SCI, and they direct DOD personnel not to visit wikileaks or view any of the leaked documents or else you are guilty of illegal use and storage of classified material.

Now, you may say I never read wikileaks. But think about this. When you read an article from a newspaper that says that the NSA monitored the phone conversations of this country's leader or that one, what do you think the source material is of that information? That's right--it came from a TS/SCI SAP. So if you have on your computer's temp internet file a cache copy of any article discussing anything about the Snowden leaks, you almost certainly have TS/SCI info on there. And you say it wasn't marked classified? So what. As former military, can you not figure out that the fact that we are monitoring a foreign country's leaders communications is highly classified? So did you all report this breach to the DOD, or did you think that since it came from an unclassified newspaper article that it must be OK? Hmmmm.

As I've said all along, the investigation will eventually release their results and we will see. But all this noise and speculation is just that. Just because you once read an SCI document and are sure you would get in trouble if you mishandled it doesn't qualify anyone to definitively state what Hillary did or what she is guilty of. They just don't know, and generally have no clue. There is a lot more involved in the classification of material than most would think. That's why it is not only possible but common for intel agencies to disagree about what is and isn't classified or SAP. It is just not the black or white answer lay people think it would be.

Honestly my opinion of Hillary Clinton remains the same. I want be voting for her. I honestly at this point know who I will be voting for.