Posted on Mar 26, 2016
How can the DoD fix the 'spend your whole budget' approach that units have?
3.11K
13
12
4
4
0
Many units in the Army -- and I suspect the DoD at large -- have a culture of "we need to max out our annual budget" or else. It's obvious why this happens -- you have a hard time asking for a budget increase in year 2 if you didn't spend it all in year 1. But what about wastefulness, which occurs at a huge scale in some large commands? Isn't it fair for the DoD to own the role it plays in budget cuts?
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
Same way they do in the private industry, trough bonuses for budget control. You go under, bonus. You go over, no bonus. Both on a graduated basis. If you miss your budget by more than 10% either way and your budgeting skills come into question. Another, is the use of zero based budgets. You have no budget and have to prove the need for each line item.
(4)
(0)
I believe this has everything to do with how funds are appropriated by Congress where they must be spent in that fiscal year. Thus, the "hurry up and spend" that comes in early September. I sure wish there was a way that a commander could bank the funds for use at a later day when they might need them. That would encourage savings and thriftiness. Then again, some commanders would get really cheap and probably not buy what they need now in order to save. I do believe that this is literally an act of Congress required to change it.
(2)
(0)
This is a curse of the Appropriations Act. That law sets up certain categories of funds that can only be used for certain purposes. These funds have expiration date. The one you are mainly referring to is Operations and Maintenance (O&M or OMA) which only has a one year shelf life on it. If you don't use the funds, they get returned to the treasury and most likely you will get less next year. The only way to change this is to change the law.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next