Posted on Oct 10, 2014
How do I address a height and weight situation?
34.3K
54
31
5
5
0
Today was the company H/W. I personally always have to be taped but have no problems passing. As I stood waiting for my calculations A very large SFC was being taped. This particular NCO has been on the program for more than a year. She also recommended a chapter for a soldier based on H/W. That soldier is now my soldier. Her(the NCO) waist measurements were called out as 2 inches less than mine. When I say this is not possible I mean THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE! My mouth literally fell open. I was then told I needed to leave because I was done. All of the tapers were also SFCs and a 1sg (not in my company). I know it was a flat out lie. How do I/ Should I address this further?
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 18
Wow...integrity check..
I would bring it up to the Chain of command. Write a statement. Someone should re-tape and sounds like some re-training!
I would bring it up to the Chain of command. Write a statement. Someone should re-tape and sounds like some re-training!
(8)
(0)
After many years in the Army, active and reserve, I can tell you this is not an isolated incident but not pandemic in the Army. This places you in a precarious position. Without proof that someone purposefully fudged the tape in the NCOs favor it would be hard to bring this forward for change and at the same time implicating several other senior NCOs as being complicit. Using your NCO support channel, as mentioned, would probably be best option if you really want to pursue this, prefacing the meeting with "I need your advice. How would be respond or proceed?"...and lay out the exact scenario you mentioned and tell that you believe the waist numbers recored were lower than actual. This could also have the potential to backfire on you. Tough decision.
(6)
(0)
Update. I did talk with my 1SG. He told me he already knew and was handling it. I asked him how he knew and even though he didn't have to tell me he did. Apparently even with the "mistake" she still did not pass. When he was going over previous records he saw the "difference" that was unlikely from her previous tape. She was re-taped. I want to thank everyone who gave me advice and supported me in bringing this to my 1sg. He did tell me I should not have waited a week to talk to him and of course not to go around talking about it to others in the unit. Thanks again for all the advice.
(5)
(0)
SGT Michael Glenn
As long as the issue has been properly dealt with and all parties have been counseled I would leave it alone . If I found out that nothing happened, a trip to IG is in order as I cannot stand a crooked chain of command.
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Eugene Harless
That is something you need to ALWAYS consider when you notice shenanigans with Senoir NCOS. Just because you don't see it getting addressed doesn't mean it wasn't seen or isn't being corrected.
"Praise in public, criticise in private" is a rule that especially applies to those dealing with Senoir Enlisted and officers. As a young Sergeant (E-5) I had a couple of SSgts (E-6s) in my unit who were as fucked up as Hogan's goat. They didn't know how to run a Howitzer Section, were constantly getting out of field operations and couldn't run PT worth crap. They both ended up getting easy jobs at Battalion just before I transfered out.
Years later after I had picked up SSgt (E-6, which is considered SNCO) I ran into another Marine SNCO who was one of their peers. He told me those two were on the 1st Sgt's and the Sgt Major's shit list big time. They were constantly getting called on the carpet and both ended up getting out short of retirement due to bad fitness reports. Just because you don't see the justice being done, or arent part of it being doled out, doesnt mean it isnt happening.
"Praise in public, criticise in private" is a rule that especially applies to those dealing with Senoir Enlisted and officers. As a young Sergeant (E-5) I had a couple of SSgts (E-6s) in my unit who were as fucked up as Hogan's goat. They didn't know how to run a Howitzer Section, were constantly getting out of field operations and couldn't run PT worth crap. They both ended up getting easy jobs at Battalion just before I transfered out.
Years later after I had picked up SSgt (E-6, which is considered SNCO) I ran into another Marine SNCO who was one of their peers. He told me those two were on the 1st Sgt's and the Sgt Major's shit list big time. They were constantly getting called on the carpet and both ended up getting out short of retirement due to bad fitness reports. Just because you don't see the justice being done, or arent part of it being doled out, doesnt mean it isnt happening.
(0)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis, you might take it up with your First Sergeant, in a one-on-one session. I can certainly see that this is a sticky situation. It's technically not your business, but we have been taught not to walk by a mistake (or in this case, apparently, dishonesty).
Other options might be the Commander's open door policy or the IG, but I would think (hope, at least) that your First Sergeant will have good advice for you. And as a First Sergeant, he or she is in a better position to address the situation.
Other options might be the Commander's open door policy or the IG, but I would think (hope, at least) that your First Sergeant will have good advice for you. And as a First Sergeant, he or she is in a better position to address the situation.
(5)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis
Thank you for the advice. I have reservations about who to talk to because I have continuously backed the soldier being chaptered. I know she will be chaptered because she "yo-yos" with here weight and can not make the standard but I know she's trying. This has not made me very popular on the subject with my 1SG. Seeing as the NCO I'm talking about is the one who made the initial recommendation for my soldiers chapter before she came to me, I am worried it will look like I am "pointing fingers" . I will talk to my 1SG and if necessary go further. My second worry is that I will be questioning the integrity of at least 4 senior NCOs.
(3)
(0)
SSG Jim S.
You are showing true leadership by looking out for your soldier. You are responsible for your soldier actions and standings, good or bad. Some times we have to take some flak for doing the right things. Part of being a leader. As CW5 Montgomery pointed out above, and I believe, Never Pass a Fault. Better to stand out for doing the right things, than the wrong ones.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SGT....you shouldn't worry about questioning the integrity of those senior NCOs, they placed themselves in that position and it sounds like you are upholding the Army Values!
(1)
(0)
Good luck with this one. Like you, it concerns me when there is a perception of an integrity violation. I want standards to be enforced fairly and accurately. I definitely do not agree with the Army's H/W standards, especially since I've started bodybuilding last year. I think you're best bet is to say you are just questioning if the waist measurement was correct. If you phrase it less like an accusation you might get a better response. Maybe state something like "I thought I heard them say her waist was 32, but maybe I misheard and it was 42." "I don't think her waist could be 32, based on my measurements and the measurements of other women I know and just wanted to ensure it was annotated correctly. Especially if the other NCO heard it 'incorrectly' as well." This could potentially give those NCOs an 'out' for fudging numbers (if they did so), but I also think it would have a better chance of getting addressed.
It really depends on what you're looking for here. If you just want it annotated correctly or if you want to know if those NCOs are fudging numbers. My experience is that senior leaders do not take it well if you question their integrity or intentions or those of a 'friend'. I'd just be prepared for potential lashback from those leaders that do not take kindly to soldiers pointing out errors or mistakes in their actinos.
It really depends on what you're looking for here. If you just want it annotated correctly or if you want to know if those NCOs are fudging numbers. My experience is that senior leaders do not take it well if you question their integrity or intentions or those of a 'friend'. I'd just be prepared for potential lashback from those leaders that do not take kindly to soldiers pointing out errors or mistakes in their actinos.
(3)
(0)
1LT William Clardy
A well-stated threat assessment and risk analysis, SGT Kristin Wiley.
It's a bummer your talents can be just as applicable internally as externally.
It's a bummer your talents can be just as applicable internally as externally.
(0)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis, I would absolutely take this event up with your PSG and 1SG. I would also annotate your observations on a MFR. When I was a 1SG, weigh-ins were in "cattle lines" meaning that there a line and everyone got on the scale. If there was taping that needed to be done, that was done with two to three personnel behind closed doors for privacy for the Soldier being taped. The Soldiers conducting the tape were of the same sex as the Soldier being taped. Again, that was how I conducted weigh-ins and taping. Take it up with your NCO Support Channel.
(3)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis
That is how we do it as well. sort of. Because we are a MEDCOM we have soldiers on shift work in a hospital and in clinics so it can not be completed in one day. It is Monday through Friday twice a day. Next week will be the APFT structured about the same way. Today was the last day for the H/W so we came in one or two at a time.
(1)
(0)
1SG Steven Stankovich
Ok, I see. Regardless, if you are passionate about seeking resolution to this, I would still go through your NCO Support channel.
(2)
(0)
What I Would do, is report it back to your own chain of command ASAP, and bring any documentations regarding this incident. I know that they make errors on doing the Height and Weight, and a lot of units do not do this correctly.
(1)
(0)
First of all, you are describing an ethics issue, not a 'height and weight" issue.
Second, you try to avoid conflating this NCO's "special treatment" with the handling of your soldier's case. Advocate for your soldier based upon her own performance -- that is the best and most ethical thing you can do for her.
As to what action you should take regarding this "very large SFC", that depends upon how much you're willing to risk to remind senior NCOs that regulations and laws (such as Article 107 of the UCMJ) still apply to them. If I was in your shoes, I'd offer your NCO chain an opportunity to intervene, but with a clear understanding that a visit to the Inspector General could be on your agenda. (CAVEAT: That advice comes from someone who was willing to give up a stripe when the occasion demanded.)
Second, you try to avoid conflating this NCO's "special treatment" with the handling of your soldier's case. Advocate for your soldier based upon her own performance -- that is the best and most ethical thing you can do for her.
As to what action you should take regarding this "very large SFC", that depends upon how much you're willing to risk to remind senior NCOs that regulations and laws (such as Article 107 of the UCMJ) still apply to them. If I was in your shoes, I'd offer your NCO chain an opportunity to intervene, but with a clear understanding that a visit to the Inspector General could be on your agenda. (CAVEAT: That advice comes from someone who was willing to give up a stripe when the occasion demanded.)
(1)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis Apples and Oranges to some degree....Army and AF are similar but different.
We too have a PT requirement that includes a waist measurement. Where ours differs from yours, is that we USED to have a HT/WT, now, we have a waist measurement, followed by push ups, sit ups and run.
So..in the measurement category, males (no matter the heigh)t, must tape at 39 or less. Females at 35 or less (around the waist, at top of hip bone-which is the fattest part of most bodies). Constant source of friction. Just ask anyone over the age of 27.
If someone is out of range, there is a BMI calculation that can be done (and I confess that I would have to look up that formula), my general understanding is that making that a passing measurement is difficult (AF folks chime in if that is accurate).
Anyway, all of my AF brethren will relate that they have seen people that are "passing", and know that there is simply no way that they are measuring under that range. It is a regular source of irritation, as there are good folks that are being put out for failure, while there are some that somehow manage to stay in.....a-la the situation that you are describing.
My advice to you would be as many others have stated, address it. If you are sure that this occurred, you would have a duty to bring it to someone's attention. The downside of this is that there will be fallout. That fallout could be from the troops, the other NCOs, and even the COC. You would be in the morally correct category, and the "personally difficult" category. I would think that your 1stSgt would be a good POC, as he/she is familiar with process and likely knows all those who did the measuring. Of course me being a cynic, I know, hard to believe, he will likely hear something along the lines of "she has a Hourglass figure"
Good luck.
We too have a PT requirement that includes a waist measurement. Where ours differs from yours, is that we USED to have a HT/WT, now, we have a waist measurement, followed by push ups, sit ups and run.
So..in the measurement category, males (no matter the heigh)t, must tape at 39 or less. Females at 35 or less (around the waist, at top of hip bone-which is the fattest part of most bodies). Constant source of friction. Just ask anyone over the age of 27.
If someone is out of range, there is a BMI calculation that can be done (and I confess that I would have to look up that formula), my general understanding is that making that a passing measurement is difficult (AF folks chime in if that is accurate).
Anyway, all of my AF brethren will relate that they have seen people that are "passing", and know that there is simply no way that they are measuring under that range. It is a regular source of irritation, as there are good folks that are being put out for failure, while there are some that somehow manage to stay in.....a-la the situation that you are describing.
My advice to you would be as many others have stated, address it. If you are sure that this occurred, you would have a duty to bring it to someone's attention. The downside of this is that there will be fallout. That fallout could be from the troops, the other NCOs, and even the COC. You would be in the morally correct category, and the "personally difficult" category. I would think that your 1stSgt would be a good POC, as he/she is familiar with process and likely knows all those who did the measuring. Of course me being a cynic, I know, hard to believe, he will likely hear something along the lines of "she has a Hourglass figure"
Good luck.
(1)
(0)
SGT Alicia Brenneis
The army averages the neck at its widest point, the waist and hips at their widest point for females. My waist is 34in (normally high in the Army) but my hips and neck measurements give me a BMI of 29%. Not fantastic but I am allowed 32%. I would be surprised if the NCO I am talking about in my original post waist was less than 40in, maybe 38in. So I was seriously surprised when they called out 32in. I have received a lot of good advice on how to handle this situation but I have to admit I am not looking forward to bringing attention to this "mistake".
(2)
(0)
Read This Next

Height and Weight
Senior Leaders
Conflict
