Posted on Jun 26, 2016
Is Brexit a harbinger of things to come in America?
6.83K
132
51
29
29
0
https://www.facebook.com/judgejeaninepirro/videos/ [login to see] 513760/
Judge Jeanine Pirro opines that the passage of Brexit in Great Britain presages a revolution in other countries, including the United States, by people tired of being told by our moral and intellectual superiors on the Left that we should sit down, shut up, and let them decide what is best. Best in the view of the progressive movement is a strong Executive Branch legislating and adjudicating the law. Thus, Barack Obama didn't invent this ideology. He is only practicing a anti-Constitutional government first advocated by Woodrow Wilson and only halted once during the Administration of Calvin Coolidge. Yes, Ronald Reagan attempted to turn back the tide but, by his own admission, he failed. Congress now passes laws without pesky details. This is why Nancy Pelosi was able to say of Obamacare that we'd have to pass it to see what's in it. What she was alluding to was the fact that the bureaucrats would have to craft rules and regulations to implement what was a broad vision hinted at in the legislation. Thus, if we once again, want to have a voice in our government, a Congress where the representatives of We the People make the laws, and courts where disputes are settled, then we too need the equivalent of Brexit.
Judge Jeanine Pirro opines that the passage of Brexit in Great Britain presages a revolution in other countries, including the United States, by people tired of being told by our moral and intellectual superiors on the Left that we should sit down, shut up, and let them decide what is best. Best in the view of the progressive movement is a strong Executive Branch legislating and adjudicating the law. Thus, Barack Obama didn't invent this ideology. He is only practicing a anti-Constitutional government first advocated by Woodrow Wilson and only halted once during the Administration of Calvin Coolidge. Yes, Ronald Reagan attempted to turn back the tide but, by his own admission, he failed. Congress now passes laws without pesky details. This is why Nancy Pelosi was able to say of Obamacare that we'd have to pass it to see what's in it. What she was alluding to was the fact that the bureaucrats would have to craft rules and regulations to implement what was a broad vision hinted at in the legislation. Thus, if we once again, want to have a voice in our government, a Congress where the representatives of We the People make the laws, and courts where disputes are settled, then we too need the equivalent of Brexit.
Politics
Election 2016
Blogging
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 17
10
10
0
The French were beaten in 1759 by the British and the American Colonials(French and Indian War) at the Plains of Abraham but its banned to have that battle recreated in Quebec. The British General was smart to allow them to keep their French Language and culture but the Quebecers are sore losers and since the 1960s they have wanted independence.
The Idiot Quebecers of Quebec Canada dream it will mean that Canada will split into West and East English-Speaking Parts(kind of like India splitting into West Pakistan and East Bangladesh) while the French-Speaking Government is broke like the F-35 JSF since their budget is always in the red.
Quebec sucks in money and social programs funding that they can't afford. Without the rest of Canada paying into their social-welfare system, they believe that they can still use the Canadian Dollar if they get Independence. Alberta, British Columiba and Saskatchewan contribute more than they take in and the Quebecer's don't understand that an Independent Quebec will be the next broke and out of money Greece or Venezuela- all for stupid myopic Nationalism.
Canadian French Francophones are so paranoid of their culture being lost to other foreign languages that English words are banned from being added to their Language (in Quebec only not in France). They have a commission over this and its a joke like their thoughts of Independence as a sure thing fiscally. They have very high taxes already.
The brexit is giving the Francophone Walter Mittys a dream of being French and Independent when the French people of France make fun of their accent and antiquated speech/coloquialisms already.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/organizers-cancel-mock-battle-of-the-plains-of-abraham-1.787562
LTC Stephen F.
COL Mikel J. Burroughs COL John Cole SSG James J. Palmer IV aka
"JP4" SrA Christopher Wright SrA Edward Vong LTC Kevin B. PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Maj Rev. Fr. Samuel WATERS - Traditional RC Priest MAJ David Potter CPT Pedro Meza CPT L S MAJ (Join to see) TSgt Scott C. Brammer TSgt Joshua Copeland
SFC William Farrell SGT (Join to see) SGT (Join to see) PFC Talal Al-Tunsi
The Idiot Quebecers of Quebec Canada dream it will mean that Canada will split into West and East English-Speaking Parts(kind of like India splitting into West Pakistan and East Bangladesh) while the French-Speaking Government is broke like the F-35 JSF since their budget is always in the red.
Quebec sucks in money and social programs funding that they can't afford. Without the rest of Canada paying into their social-welfare system, they believe that they can still use the Canadian Dollar if they get Independence. Alberta, British Columiba and Saskatchewan contribute more than they take in and the Quebecer's don't understand that an Independent Quebec will be the next broke and out of money Greece or Venezuela- all for stupid myopic Nationalism.
Canadian French Francophones are so paranoid of their culture being lost to other foreign languages that English words are banned from being added to their Language (in Quebec only not in France). They have a commission over this and its a joke like their thoughts of Independence as a sure thing fiscally. They have very high taxes already.
The brexit is giving the Francophone Walter Mittys a dream of being French and Independent when the French people of France make fun of their accent and antiquated speech/coloquialisms already.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/organizers-cancel-mock-battle-of-the-plains-of-abraham-1.787562
LTC Stephen F.
COL Mikel J. Burroughs COL John Cole SSG James J. Palmer IV aka
"JP4" SrA Christopher Wright SrA Edward Vong LTC Kevin B. PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Maj Rev. Fr. Samuel WATERS - Traditional RC Priest MAJ David Potter CPT Pedro Meza CPT L S MAJ (Join to see) TSgt Scott C. Brammer TSgt Joshua Copeland
SFC William Farrell SGT (Join to see) SGT (Join to see) PFC Talal Al-Tunsi
Organizers cancel mock Battle of the Plains of Abraham
The National Battlefields Commission has cancelled a re-enactment of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham set for Quebec City this summer due to security concerns that the mock battle could turn into a modern-day conflict.
(10)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
LTC (Join to see) - Pushing Strange Laundry Carts at Night between 7 North Audley St in London and the US Embassy they might have had some S.H.I.E.L.D. Equipment. All I know is that I'm still persona non grata there after filling the place with Black Smoke.
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel - Did you watch the undergound ficticious places destroyed that were covert shield labs or offices in the Avenger movies? They looked awesome!
(3)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
LTC (Join to see) - I am ashamed to say I haven't seen the movie yet. One to see I'm sure to compare how it reflects with the real thing.
(2)
(0)
SMSgt Sheila Berg
CPT Jack Durish - Some would like the UN to have that role! Imagine being rules by Third World countries.
(2)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
I do think the move by Britain to leave the EU emulates a little of whats happening here in the states. That the majority of the citizens are tired of the lies and misleading of their elected or appointed leaders. It also shows that the idea of globalization may not be the best idea. That a one world government creates more problems then it solves.
I do think the move by Britain to leave the EU emulates a little of whats happening here in the states. That the majority of the citizens are tired of the lies and misleading of their elected or appointed leaders. It also shows that the idea of globalization may not be the best idea. That a one world government creates more problems then it solves.
(7)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Not all people have the moral fiber to be free. Liberty comes with consequences and responsibilities. Look around you at those who want freedom only from responsibility and who are ready to surrender all other freedoms to get it. Sadly, it seems that is about half of our population. How can you then have a nation where one half are free while the other half seek to surrender it? Imagine then one world in a similar situation. What are you prepared to surrender to live in such a world?
(3)
(0)
MSgt James Trent
I don't know if it is a harbinger of things to come or not but I think it is a step in the right direction. What irritates me about the vote is that because they didn't get the vote they liked they are now trying to pass measures that say if the vote passed by this much then a second vote has to be made. The gap in yes/no votes just so happens to be the gap that the removal had. They were saying that people didn't go out to vote because they believed polls saying the removal would fail.
First, if people are so stupid to believe polls as the God spoken truth then when have voting? Go with polls because they are easier :) Second, If they are too stupid to realize that polls could have been taken of just the illegals, criminals and leeches who would benefit from staying then they shouldn't get to vote. Third, if people are too lazy to vote for it then they can't complain later because they didn't get a response they liked.
First, if people are so stupid to believe polls as the God spoken truth then when have voting? Go with polls because they are easier :) Second, If they are too stupid to realize that polls could have been taken of just the illegals, criminals and leeches who would benefit from staying then they shouldn't get to vote. Third, if people are too lazy to vote for it then they can't complain later because they didn't get a response they liked.
(3)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
MSgt James Trent - Polls are a wonderful way to either discourage or encourage people to vote or not. Despite the fact that polls, especially in recent elections, have been so wrong, there are many who are still swayed by them.
(1)
(0)
5
5
0
Brexit wasn't about any of that. I was about whether or not to cede sovereignty to a dying trade block that has aspirations of becoming the United States of Europe. The EUs only elected officials are only allowed to vote for or against a law they aren't allowed to propose legislation. Only the EEC can and they are appointed not elected. The EU is trying to create a central bank and a Continental army. The EU is another bureaucracy on top of the already existing bureaucracies of local and national government in Britain.
Let's talk economics. To trade in the EU all of Britain's industry must comply with EU policy, however to trade with the US (Britain's greatest trade partner) only the businesses conducting trade with the US need to meet US regulations. Why would any country want to be hampered by the rules of a dying trade block.
Let's talk economics. To trade in the EU all of Britain's industry must comply with EU policy, however to trade with the US (Britain's greatest trade partner) only the businesses conducting trade with the US need to meet US regulations. Why would any country want to be hampered by the rules of a dying trade block.
(5)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Please explain "...any of that". Also, please explain how what you describe Brexit as being is different than "...and of that".
(0)
(0)
SGT Tony Clifford
Well sir, I was referring to how it's not a question about the incompetence of politicians it was about sovereignty. The British people felt that they were better suited to decide their fate than a non elected governmental body (EEC)
(2)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SGT Tony Clifford - Okay, that is a very reasonable deduction. Although, to be fair, I don't see how it's much different than Judge Pirro's assessment. It's like looking at the same statue from the opposite side.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google