Posted on Jun 21, 2014
SSgt Structural Craftsman
31K
1.07K
270
12
12
0
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 78
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
MAJ Commander
2
2
0
If they really wanted the team name to be less upsetting to people they should rename them the Maryland Redskins.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Structural Craftsman
SSgt (Join to see)
11 y
How is that different than the Washington Redskins
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Commander
MAJ (Join to see)
11 y
Fewer people are upset with the name Redskins than are upset with Washington.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Structural Craftsman
SSgt (Join to see)
11 y
ok I get you that's funny.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Commander
MAJ (Join to see)
11 y
And I'm here all week. Tip your administrators.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Disabled Veteran Outreach Program
1
1
0
Change the logo to a potato, then everyone can shut up about it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Steve Vincent
1
1
0
This is nothing but political correctness run amok, and demagoguery on the part of the Democratic party. History( i.e. facts) show us that the person who came up with the name and emblem wasn't some old white guy who was an evil, racist fart, but a Native American. Over 80% of all Native Americans polled agreed that the term is not offensive to them, and they fail to see what the hubbub is about. It appears that this is nothing more of the same; the Democratic Party telling people what they should/shouldn't be offended over, and if they still won't be offended, be offended for them! There are about a million things more important that the Senate in particular, and the Government as whole, should be concentrating on. This is absolutely ridiculous.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
1
1
0
As a Dallas fan I stand shoulder to shoulder with our Redskin rival. That NFL ex-ref Cary sucks and so do the people whose biggest issue is a name. For crying out loud, rape is rampant on the reservation. I bet the victims would rather have the name change to offset the bad done on the reservations. I saw the pain and misery because of alcohol and sexual assault.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Richard White
1
1
0
This country is getting to politically correct in my opinion.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Maurice P.
SSG Maurice P.
>1 y
Yes it is very wrong............................
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Everett Wilson
SSG Everett Wilson
>1 y
No I think "Washington" should be drop, since its becoming to embarrassing for the team's moral
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
1
1
0
I am offended by the fact that I am offended by offensive offensiveness. I stop counting...lol
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Maurice P.
SSG Maurice P.
>1 y
people we are heading towards socialism we are not the country that we were when i was a young marine in the mid 1970's its gone never to come back....................
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj Chris Nelson
1
1
0
Sometimes, politicians and "political correctness" go to far...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Dana Glusovich
1
1
0
If its offensive to a large demographic of our society, and it is, then change the name, its pretty cut and dried.
Money will be there, its the NFL, and there is so much $$ to be made with rebranding its rediculous...
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Daniel Deiler
SSG Daniel Deiler
11 y
I'm in 100% agreeance with MAJ Carl Ballinger . If a demographic chooses to be offended by a team name and organization whose intention is NOT to denegrate or offend, then that's a problem they have to deal with themselves.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
11 y
SSG Deiler, I am begging you, please, strike the NON word agreeance from your vocabulary. It needs to be killed with fire. You are in AGREEMENT with MAJ Ballinger.

And while I think this whole brouhaha is a tempest in a teapot, I can't come down on either side, because I know as a black man how I would feel if the team was the 'Washington N*****s'

While I can appreciate intentions, I also have an issue with my fellow blacks who use that word because I reject the notion of taking back the power of the word.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Dana Glusovich
SGT Dana Glusovich
11 y
How would you feel if the team were the Washington Niggers? Would you CHOOSE to be offended? I ask as the majority of the uninformed, ignorant responses have, and I'l paraphrase here, you have to CHOOSE to be offended, and that is your problem, not the one offending. With that logic, why do these very same people feel so offended and afraid of gay marriage, or even accept scientific fact about evolution vs. the fairy tale of creation by some magical being in the sky who is kind but will damn you to eternity in fire, blah, blah, blah...
And one would have to be pretty ignorant to a capitalist society to not understand the fundamentals of how an owner would be able to cash in by changing the offensive name. There are a lot of backward ass cowards posting here... just sayin'
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Maurice P.
SSG Maurice P.
>1 y
I WOULDNT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT........I THINK OUR SUPERDOME HERE IN LOUISIANA OUGHT TO CHANGE ITS NAME TO (WHO DAT)DOWN HERE THAT IS WHAT THE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO SEE
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Neil Brennan
1
1
0
On one hand I think the franchise has treated their icon with the greatest of respect over the years; on the other I'd love to hear some suggestions for a new sobriquet, it could be a hoot.
Not that many years ago the Washington Bullets change their name to the more PC Wizards. It always is good for a chuckle when a bunch of drunken fans get up and cheer "Let's GO WIZ"...and so they would:-)
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC MLRS/HIMARS Crewmember
1
1
0
I think they should change it to the Washington Piscataways (the group of Algonquian who inhabited Maryland/DC area)... Yes, there are a bunch of you who will stumble on the proper pronunciation.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Brett Wagner
Cpl Brett Wagner
11 y
SSG Christopher Taylor - You're right people will stumble over the pronunciation, unless they grew up in NY or NY. lol
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC MLRS/HIMARS Crewmember
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
I grew up driving over the Piscatiqua river between Maine and NH.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Allison Churchill
1
1
0
Yes, people who want to be offended will always find something offensive if they look hard enough.

But every other team name that people are listing as possibly offensive was at one point a nickname for a group of people that they themselves used. Notre Dame U. was started by Irish people, and Irish people created the "Fighting Irish" team name.

"Redskins" was never a positive term. Never. It's a leftover from a really ugly period of America's history. It should have never been a team name to begin with, and there's no reason for it to be a team name now.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Allison Churchill
SGT Allison Churchill
11 y
I'll concede you're right on the first part; however, the second part has been discredited: http://thinkprogress.org/sports/2014/05/30/3443168/redskins-founder-i-didnt-name-team-to-honor-native-americans/

In either case, the word's been used as a slur for at least 100 years. Would you walk up to a stranger you believed to be Native American and call them a Redskin?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
1
1
0
Are we going to change the Atlanta Braves as well?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
1
1
0
Now they are targeting the Kansas City Chiefs because of their name!
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Structural Craftsman
SSgt (Join to see)
11 y
Yea now its just going to be a domino effect.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
1
1
0
(1)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Scott Hurley
TSgt Scott Hurley
11 y
Oh great.... Then they will go after the AF, Navy, and Coast guard to change the ranks that use Chief in them.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
11 y
Too bad the name of the KC Chiefs originally did NOT have anything to do with Indians. Lamar Hunt, the long time owner of the team, moved them from Dallas (where they were known as the Dallas Texans), where they were originally from, to Kansas City. As a result of a contest, the name was changed to Chiefs, which was in honor of Lamar's friend, KC Mayor Harold Bartle, whose nickname was Chief.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Charles Brown
SPC Charles Brown
11 y
I wonder if the Navy would have a fit if the Chiefs put a picture of an aircraft carrier on the side of their helmets and kept the name Chiefs in honor of them?
(2)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
11 y
I think the Navy would be tickled pink. I've known a few Navy Chiefs.....
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
1
1
0
The only thing wrong is that the team was named this to begin with. People need to brush up on their history and stop looking the other way. Native Americans in the past have been referred to as the "Red man" which is pretty derogatory if you ask me. That's like calling Asians "Yellow skins". The Redskins team name should have changed long before the Washington Bullets were renamed the Wizards. That got changed because people were uncomfortable with the weapon reference. Seriously...give me a break. At least that name wasn't a racial stereotype.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Jersun Amos
1
1
0
Though I'm not a redskin's fan, I think that it's wrong because of the fact that it's been socially acceptable up to this point and they are already a nationally recognized institution.  So why now make a change, when it's what we're used to.  It doesn't promote racial segregation nor does it promote racism, in my opinion....they are just a football team.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Brett Wagner
1
1
0
There are too many groups in America today. Instead of being Irish-American, German-American, African-American, Mexican-American, etc. We should all just concentrate on being Americans. We are one big family and we are going to hurt each other from time to time but the important part is that we recognize it and recover instead of dwelling on the bad. I leave you all with this great speech by John Wayne.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fuzLTrwVbc
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Noah Grove
1
1
0
It is a derogatory term, plain and simple. It needs to be changed.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Ehr Specialist
1
1
0
A part of my ethnic background is Navajo, so though I am ethnically Native American, I am truly American for having been born in the United states and further I am a patriotic American for having served my country. Having said that, reading many of the responses here, I see a great deal of emotion tied into this subject. Frankly I think that mistakes were made with Native American groups. The biggest IMHO, is allowing them to maintain sovereignty and entitlements. I firmly believe just as in any other conquest, the losing side is absorbed into the winning side culture. Maintaining identity, culture, customs, etc. is certainly acceptable. Now having stated that as sovereign nations I do not believe they should have a voice in how any one business, organization, individual conducts themselves. It would be as if Mexico decided they didn't like the look of the Sombrero guy on a taco stand. I am proud to be "Native American" but I do think they have bigger fish to fry; such as combating rampant alcoholism, crime, abuse etc. I read earlier where someone stated this was frivolous and was downvoted. Well in the bigger picture a sports team logo is not as important as many other social injustices which need greater attention drawn to them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Cryptologic Linguist
1
1
0
Where is everyone getting the idea that anyone is forcing them to change their name, btw?
The ruling was that they can't trademark that term. No one has ever said or insinuated that they will be forced to change the name of the team. Someone watching too much cable news hysteria?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Structural Craftsman
SSgt (Join to see)
11 y
The term was trademarked for years, they have recently revoked the trademark.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Cryptologic Linguist
SPC (Join to see)
11 y
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark#Usage

Therefore this team cannot sue anyone for using the term "Redskins". Lots of things are identified by non-trademarked terms. The patent office has simply decided not to continue to trademark this term. Anyone is welcome to use it without being sued for trademark infringement.

There are no other implications.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

How are you connected to the military?
  • Active Duty
  • Active Reserve / National Guard
  • Pre-Commission
  • Veteran / Retired
  • Civilian Supporter